Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36382009›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2022

Motivations and personality characteristics of candidate sperm and oocyte donors according to parenthood status: a national study from the French CECOS network.

L Bujan, N Nouri, A Papaxanthos-Roche, B Ducrocq, F Brugnon, C Ravel, N Rives, M Teletin, V Drouineaud, B Delepine and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

L BujanCECOS-Service de Médecine de la Reproduction, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1540-0536
N NouriCECOS-Service de Médecine de la Reproduction, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
A Papaxanthos-RocheService de Biologie de la Reproduction, CECOS de Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6614-8065
B DucrocqCECOS Nord, Hôpital Calmette, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
F BrugnonAMP-CECOS Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8402-8734
C RavelCECOS Rennes, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5013-6932
N RivesBiology of Reproduction-CECOS Laboratory, EA 4308 Gametogenesis and Gamete Quality, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9102-1111
M TeletinCECOS Alsace, CHRU de Strasbourg, Schiltigheim, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3286-8125
V DrouineaudService de Biologie de la Reproduction-CECOS, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5739-431X
B DelepineService de Biologie de la Reproduction, CECOS Champagne-Ardenne, CHU de Reims, Reims, France.
I BerthautService de Biologie de la Reproduction-CECOS, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3617-3769
C Metzler-GuillemainAssistance-Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, La Conception, Centre Clinico-Biologique AMP-CECOS, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1971-1932
A DevauxCECOS Amiens, CHU Picardie, Amiens, France.
C FrapsauceCECOS Centre Tours, CHRU Hôpitaux de Tours, Tours, France.
E ThibaultCECOS Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Nice, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1047-8441
O BlagosklonovCECOS Franche-Comté Bourgogne Besançon, CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France.
M A ClarottiCECOS Caen Basse Normandie, CHU Caen, Caen, France.
C DiligentCECOS de Nancy, Centre d'AMP, CHRU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
V Loup CabaniolsCECOS Languedoc Roussillon Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
P FauqueCECOS Franche-Comté Bourgogne, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-1710
M BenchaibCECOS Rhône-Alpes Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5250-6036
F EustacheCECOS Paris-Jean Verdier, AP-HP, Bondy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9231-8846
M DaudinDEFE UMR Inserm 1203, Universités de Montpellier et Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3700-5596
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRCOMUE Languedoc-Roussillon Universités · FRHôpital Cochin · FRHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionIn a non-commercial national gamete donation programme, do the motivations and personality characteristics of candidate sperm and oocyte donors differ according to their parenthood status? SUMMARY ANSWER: Moderate differences exist between non-parent and parent candidate donors in motivations for gamete donation and representations as well as in personality characteristics. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several studies have analysed the motivations and experiences of oocyte or sperm donors, but mainly in countries where gamete donation is a commercial transaction, and very few studies have reported results of personality traits using personality inventory tests. No study has specifically investigated the motivations and personality characteristics of candidate gamete donors according to parenthood status. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A prospective study was carried out including 1021 candidate donors from 21 centres (in university hospitals) of the national sperm and egg banking network in France between November 2016 and December 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsIn total, 1021 candidate gamete donors were included in the study. During their first visit, male (n = 488) and female candidate donors (n = 533) completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics, their motivations for donation and their representations of donation, infertility and family. Secondly, a NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) exploring the Big Five personality traits was completed online. Results were compared between parent and non-parent candidate donors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Altruistic values were the principal motive for donation irrespective of parenthood status. Reassurance about their fertility or preservation of sperm for future use was more often reported in non-parent than in parent candidate donors. With regard to representation of gamete donation or of the family, independently of their parenthood status, candidate donors more frequently selected social rather than biological representations. Mean personality characteristics were in the normal range. Non-parent candidate donors had higher scores on openness and depression than parents, while parent candidate donors appeared more social than non-parents. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The personality characteristics inventory was not completed by all candidate donors included in the study. However, family status did not differ between the two groups (NEO-PI-R completed (n = 525) or not), while the group who completed the NEO-PI-R had a higher educational level. This national study was performed in a country where gamete donation is subject to strict legislation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsIn a global context where reproductive medicine is commercialized and gamete donor resources are limited, this study found that altruism and social representations of gamete donation and family are the main motivations for gamete donation in a country which prohibits financial incentive. These findings are relevant for health policy and for gamete donation information campaigns. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Grant from the Agence de la Biomédecine, France. The authors have nothing to disclose related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

altruismgamete donationmotivationsNEO Personality Inventoryoocyte donationparenthood statuspersonality characteristicssocial representationsperm donation

Identifiers

PMID36382009
PMCPMC9641712
OpenAlexW4306795909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.