Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36382004›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2022

Myocardial bridge evaluation towards personalized medicine: study design and preliminary results of the RIALTO registry.

Domenico D'Amario, Giuseppe Ciliberti, Attilio Restivo, Renzo Laborante, Stefano Migliaro, Francesco Canonico, Giuseppe Massimo Sangiorgi, Matteo Tebaldi, Italo Porto, Daniele Andreini and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06281067 (Reassessment of myocardIAL Bridge TOwards PeRsOnalized Medicine), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06281067 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Reassessment of myocardIAL Bridge TOwards PeRsOnalized Medicine: RIALTO PRO

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della CaritaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsMyocardial BridgeArms"full-physiology approach" arm, "standard approach" arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Domenico D'AmarioDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Giuseppe CilibertiDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Attilio RestivoDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Renzo LaboranteDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Stefano MigliaroUnità di Cardiologia, Aurelia Hospital, Rome 00165, Italy.
Francesco CanonicoDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Giuseppe Massimo SangiorgiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Institute of Cardiology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy.
Matteo TebaldiCardiologic Center, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara 44124, Italy.
Italo PortoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, Genova 16132, Italy.
Daniele AndreiniCentro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan 20138, Italy.
Rocco VergalloDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Antonio Maria LeoneDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Salvatore GervasiDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Michela CammaranoDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Vincenzo PalmieriDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Francesco BurzottaDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Carlo TraniDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Paolo ZeppilliDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
Filippo CreaDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.
RIALTO Registry Investigators
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAurelia Hospital · ITCentro Cardiologico Monzino · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocardial bridge (MB) is the most frequent inborn coronary artery variant in which a portion of the myocardium overlies an epicardial coronary artery segment. Although MB has long been considered a benign entity, a growing body of evidence has suggested its association with angina and adverse cardiac events. However, to date, no data on long-term prognosis are available, nor on therapies improving cardiovascular outcomes. We are currently conducting an ambispective, observational, multicentre, study in which we enrol patients with a clinical indication to undergo coronary angiography (CA) and evidence of MB, aiming to describe the incidence of symptoms and cardiovascular events at baseline and at long-term follow-up (FUP). The role of invasive full-physiology assessment in modifying the discharge therapy and eventually the perceived quality of life and the incidence of major cardiovascular events will be analysed. Basal clinical-instrumental data of eligible and consenting patients have been acquired after CA; FUP was performed 6, 12, and 24 months after the angiographic diagnosis of MB. The primary endpoint of the study is the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, cardiac hospitalization, and target vessel revascularization; the secondary endpoints are the rate of patients with Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) summary score <70 and the incidence of MACE in patients undergoing invasive intracoronary assessment. Among patients undergone FUP visits, we recorded 31 MACE at 6 months (11.6%), 16 MACE at 12 months (6.5%), and 26 MACE at 24 months (13.5%). The rate of patients with SAQ <70 is 18.8% at 6 months, 20.6% at 12 months, and 21.8% at 24 months. To evaluate the prognostic role of invasive intracoronary assessment, we compared MB patients who underwent only angiographic evaluation (Angio group) to those who underwent acetylcholine (ACH) provocative test with indication to calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) at discharge (Angio + ACH + CCBs group) and those who underwent functional assessment with fractional flow reserve (FFR) with indication to beta-blockers (BBs) at discharge (Angio + FFR + BBs group). After 2 years of FUP, the rate of MACE was significantly reduced in both Angio + ACH + CCBs group (6 vs. 25%,

Indexed as

Intracoronary imagingIntracoronary physiologyInvasive intracoronary assessmentMyocardial bridgeMyocardial ischaemiaPersonalized therapyPrognosisProvocative test

Identifiers

PMID36382004
PMCPMC9650458
OpenAlexW4308917619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.