Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36382002›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2022

Remote digital smart device follow-up in prospective clinical trials: early insights from ORBITA-2, ORBITA-COSMIC, and ORBITA-STAR.

Sashiananthan Ganesananthan, Christopher A Rajkumar, Michael Foley, Darrel Francis, Rasha Al-Lamee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Reconsidering the evidence for CTO PCI: the devil is in the detail.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sashiananthan GanesananthanDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Christopher A RajkumarDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Michael FoleyDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Darrel FrancisDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Rasha Al-LameeDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S021108/1Medical Research Council MR/V001620/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smart devices are a fundamental media for acquisition, processing, storage, and transfer of digital health data. The global penetration and high frequency usage of smart devices such as smartphones and fitness monitors provide us an opportunity for incorporation into clinical trials to generate more clinically meaningful data. Reporting of angina can significantly vary between patients and also within patients at different timepoints. Furthermore, the nature of angina can lead to variation in ways patients adapt their activities of daily living and hence reporting of symptoms and quality of life. Current clinical trials investigating the effects of intervention on angina do not accurately incorporate these patient centred outcomes and considerations. Hence, methods to contemporaneously assess daily angina burden in a convenient, patient focused, and cost-effective manner are priorities for contemporary clinical trials to address. In this article, we provide our insights into the use of remote digital smart devices in clinical trials of stable coronary artery disease conducted by our research group. We discuss how our experiences from previous trials necessitated its incorporation and will provide us with important data that will inform clinical practice. We discuss the benefits and current challenges and limitations of smart device incorporation while providing our procedural workflow for how we incorporated smart devices into our clinical trials for others to consider. We hope that this approach will allow us to understand the perceptions and implications of angina on patient lives with greater granularity than previously explored.

Indexed as

AnginaClinical trialsDigital follow-upPlacebo-controlSmartphoneStable coronary artery disease

Identifiers

PMID36382002
PMCPMC9650463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.