ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2022
Usability of Emergency Department Information System Based on Users' Viewpoint; a Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Usability evaluation methods for hospital information systems: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Usability Evaluation of Dashboards: A Systematic Literature Review of Tools.BioMed research international · 2023Pooled it
- Robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery at the operational level: an investigation of surgeons' perspectives.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Mixed Reality for Cranial Neurosurgical Planning: A Single-Center Applicability Study With the First 107 Subsequent Holograms.Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2023Article
- Analysis of articles in the Journal of Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine in 2022.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The emergency department is of special importance due to its emergency and vital services, the high volume of referrals, and the patients' physical condition. Thus, it requires a well-designed information system with no usability problems. This study aimed to evaluate the usability of the emergency department information system from users' perspectives. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. The research setting was the emergency department of 3 hospitals. The research instrument was a 37-item questionnaire adapted from the USE and ISO Metrics questionnaires, consisting of five dimensions measuring the usefulness of the system, ease of use, ease of learning, user satisfaction, and suitability for the task. The content validity of the questionnaire was examined using the content validity ratio and content validity index, and its reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.88). Results: Fifty questionnaires were administered in the three hospitals, and the response rate was 80%. According to the findings, 55% of the respondents were female. The highest mean scores belonged to usefulness in emergency department information system (EDIS) A, ease of use in EDIS B, ease of learning in EDIS A, user satisfaction in EDIS C, and suitability for the task in EDIS A. According to the usability evaluation criteria, ease of learning (3.66 ± 0.74), usefulness (3.53 ± 0.87), and suitability for the task (3.47 ± 0.96) received the highest scores, and the lowest scores belonged to user satisfaction (3.29 ± 1.01) and ease of use (3.12 ± 1.00). Conclusion: In terms of usability criteria, the emergency department information system is at a relatively good level. The usability of these systems can be further enhanced by considering the users' working needs, improving software flexibility, customizing the software, using data visualization tools, observing consistency of features and standards, and increasing the quality of information and system services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.