ReviewCureus2022
A Look Into the Next Century After 100 Years of Insulin.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Needle characteristics and the insulin injection experience in patients with diabetes.Acta diabetologica · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Being diagnosed with diabetes can be challenging, particularly if we do not know a similar individual with the same disease. A person's life may suddenly change and he/she may not be aware of the possibilities or treatment options available or the questions that need to be asked; hence, instead of looking for assistance, many people hide their diabetic condition from others. But due to innovative devices, individuals no longer need to be concerned. Various gadgets today help provision insulin via a subcutaneous route, for example, an insulin pen, pump, vial, or syringe. Despite being the most familiar way to provide insulin, subcutaneous insulin delivery is linked to needle pain, injection anxiety, lipodystrophy, compliance issues, and peripheral hyperinsulinemia; thus, there is a need for an insulin delivery system that is both less invasive and more biological. The discovery of insulin and its uses are linked to the beginning of diabetes treatment. Initially, the delivery of insulin was accomplished using giant, heavy, reusable syringes equipped with plungers, barrels, and wide-bore needles. To prepare these syringes and needles for reuse, these were boiled. The development of insulin syringes, which are presently in use and have revolutionized healthcare, resulted from manufacturers' continued efforts and technological innovations. Injections of insulin may become obsolete if research from the University of Alberta is successful. Researchers from the University of Alberta claim that insulin-producing cells developed from stem cells are secure for transplantation to wean diabetes patients from injectable insulin permanently. In a significant mice experiment, experts demonstrated the role of the inceptor (insulin inhibitory receptor), which protects the beta cells from insulin pathway activation. Insulin resistance in diabetes may be exacerbated by the inceptor's ability to block insulin signaling. Technologies known as "smart insulin" (glucose-responsive insulin) deliver insulin according to the patient's glycemic condition without needing additional monitoring by the patient or the physician in charge. The review of insulin administration devices and several cutting-edge insulin-related ideas are the main topics of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.