ReviewCureus2022
Adverse Obstetric Outcomes in Pregnant Women Using Natalizumab for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disease-modifying therapies and hematological disorders: a systematic review of case reports and case series.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis is a common disease in women of childbearing age, characterized by demyelination of the central nervous system. Among the different treatment options available, disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are the most efficacious, and natalizumab (NAT) is an injectable DMT best for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. However, it comes under pregnancy category C drug classification. This systematic review aims to analyze the adverse outcomes of using NAT during pregnancy. PubMed/Medline, PubMed Central (PMC), ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were the databases used to search for articles. Appropriate keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) strategy were used to identify relevant articles. Articles were then screened using inclusion/exclusion criteria followed by the title and abstract screening. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) quality appraisal tools were used for quality check, and nine articles were finalized for review. NAT suspension during pregnancy is shown to have a high risk of disease relapse. Despite the risk of mild hematological abnormalities in the newborn and the risk of spontaneous abortions at the same rate as that of the general population, NAT use can be considered safe in pregnancy. These adverse outcomes can be minimized by strict monitoring of patients. Studies of better quality with larger sample sizes are needed for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.