ReviewCureus2022
DNA Fingerprinting: Use of Autosomal Short Tandem Repeats in Forensic DNA Typing.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- An avuncular relationship generating a parent-offspring signal in forensic familial DNA searching: a case report.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond the Core: The Role of Supplementary Short Tandem Repeats in Forensic Genetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Evaluate the forensic efficiency parameters of the D13S317 gene in closely related family members in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Estimating the Genetic Risk of First-Degree Relatives for Chronic Diseases Using the Short Tandem Repeat Score as Model of Polygenic Inheritance.Biochemical genetics · 2025Article
- Safety Assessment of Stem Cell-Based Therapies: Current Standards and Advancing Frameworks.Cells · 2025Review
- Decoding Nucleotide Repeat Expansion Diseases: Novel Insights fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Identification of the genetic background of laboratory rats through amplicon-based next-generation sequencing for single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping.BMC genomic data · 2024Article
- Nucleic Acid Based Testing (NABing): A Game Changer Technology for Public Health.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Review
- A novel 193-plex MPS panel integrating STRs and SNPs highlights the application value of forensic genetics in individual identification and paternity testing.Human genetics · 2024Article
- Genetic characteristics of spouse selection based on short tandem repeats in DNA and lunula count on fingertip.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2023Article
- Novel strategy of multiple-locus variable number tandem repeats analysis for genetic fingerprinting of human.Genes & genomics · 2023Article
- Cell Proteomic Footprinting: Advances in the Quality of Cellular and Cell-Derived Cancer Vaccines.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short tandem repeat (STR) markers for autosomal STR are used in forensic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) typing to track down the missing, verify family connections, and potentially connect suspects to crime sites. It is well acknowledged that forensically relevant genetic markers cannot predict phenotype. There is no evidence to support the claim that directly using forensic STR variations causes or indicates illness. Such an example would have significant ethical and permissible repercussions. It is essential to check the necessity to alert a blood donor or if a medical problem is identified during routine sample analysis. In this study, we assess the likelihood that forensic STRs might offer details beyond those required for primary identification. However, as the role of non-coding STRs in gene regulation is understood, the probability of discovering meaningful links is rising. For this review, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Google Search were all used to conduct a thorough electronic literature search. If they linked to the topic, thoughts, retrospective studies, observational studies, and first publications were considered. The case studies presented here highlight the critical role forensic DNA typing plays in reducing criminal risk and delivering conclusive evidence in cases. The primary method for forensic DNA typing is short tandem repeat (STR) typing. This discussion on the importance of STR markers to the criminal justice system is part of the present study. As unflinching proof of false beliefs and invaluable connections to the genuine culprits, DNA typing offers proof that may be utilised to prosecute and punish criminals. It may even deter certain offenders from committing more terrible offences. Additionally, forensic experts have used DNA typing techniques to re-examine ancient cases previously closed due to a lack of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.