ArticleCureus2022
Clinical Practice and the Attitude of Ophthalmologists Regarding Amblyopia in the Population of Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim The study was aimed at finding out the knowledge and attitude among ophthalmologists regarding amblyopia in the population of Jordan. Methodology This was an observational cross-sectional study conducted in 2021 among ophthalmologists who live and work in the local society of Jordan and were aged between 30 and 50 years. The survey was conducted using an online questionnaire administered through email and various social media platforms. The level of knowledge and awareness of amblyopia, its causes, methods of treatment, and the best age for treating amblyopia was assessed. Results Out of 200 participants, the majority were in the age group of 30-34 years (47.5%). The male:female ratio was 1:1. The average better age for examination and treatment of amblyopia was three to five years (46%). The most common cause of amblyopia was strabismic amblyopia (50%). Children's and parents' cooperation most significantly influenced the treatment's success (49%). The preferred assessment was cycloplegic refraction (56%), and the preferred patching treatment was a direct cover placed over the eye (77%). The average time to treat amblyopia was less than three years in the majority (53.5%). The most critical factor determining the success of treatment was when the treatment began (57.5%). Conclusions Our study found that although the majority of the participants were less experienced overall, they had a good knowledge of the amblyopia age group and the method of examination. Still, there was a mixed response regarding the treatment. Hence there is a need to increase awareness regarding amblyopia by Jordanian ophthalmologists, social organizations, and educational institutes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.