ArticleCureus2022
An Entrapped Vacuum Drainage Tube Between the Surfaces of a Dual-Mobility Cup Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Closed Suction Drainage May Not be Beneficial in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper aims to present the unique, to the best of our knowledge, case of entrapment of a standard vacuum drainage tube in the articulating surfaces of the cup of dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty. A 75-year-old woman with end-stage idiopathic avascular necrosis of the left femoral head was referred to the arthroplasty service of our tertiary orthopedic department. She underwent a scheduled and uneventful total hip arthroplasty with a press-fit dual-mobility prosthesis through a standard posterior approach. On the second postoperative day, the attempt to remove the standard vacuum drainage was unsuccessful. Consequently, the patient underwent urgent re-operation. The drain tube was found entrapped between the articulating surfaces of the posterior-inferior aspect of the dual-mobility cup and was uneventfully removed. The patient was discharged with no further events three days after her second operation. Our unique rare case increases awareness when performing even routine everyday surgical procedures because a rare complication may occur irrespective of the level of vigilance of the surgeon and can potentially compromise the outcomes of an otherwise well-performed operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.