Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36381763›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

A Pilot Study of Augmented Intelligence Risk-Based Stratification for Endocrine Surgical Waiting List Prioritisation.

Lavandan Jegatheeswaran, Neil Tolley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lavandan JegatheeswaranOtolaryngology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Neil TolleyOtolaryngology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The New Deal for Surgery report encouraged using new technology in healthcare to address the 377,689 patients in England awaiting National Health Service (NHS) hospital treatment in July 2022. During the pandemic's second wave, this pilot study investigated the utility of COMPASS Surgical List Triage (COMPASS SLT; C2-Ai, Cambridge, England), an augmented intelligence-based system, in assisting surgical decision-making on patient prioritisation. Data generated from COMPASS SLT was compared to data from the British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons' (BAETS) and Federation of Surgical Specialties Associations' (FSSA) prioritisation guidance. Methods A cohort of thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy patients on the surgical waiting list at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom, was used. COMPASS SLT calculated individuals' mortality and significant morbidity risk (risk >2.5%). Significant morbidity risk was set at 2.5% or above following internal model validation, thus reducing the risk of model overfitting occurring with COMPASS SLT. The additional increase in mortality and morbidity due to treatment delay was calculated. Actual treatment time was aligned to the treatment delay (in weeks) experienced by each patient. Results Twenty-nine patients, with a median age of 43 years and a waiting time of 18 weeks at the onset of the second wave, were enrolled. Non-statistically significant differences (p=0.937) between the FSSA and BAETS classifications were identified. However, cohort size could promote a type II error. An increase in median mortality and morbidity risk (p<0.001) arising from treatment delay and decisions based on the FSSA and BAETS classifications were identified. Conclusion COMPASS SLT can supplement clinical decision-making. An augmented intelligence tool can provide clinicians objectivity and flexibility in prioritising patients, with information on individual morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence in healthcareclinical decision supportdecision support systemmachine learning approacheswaiting list

Identifiers

PMID36381763
PMCPMC9636559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.