Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36381623›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Clinical Characteristics and Histopathology in Suspected Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections.

Ingunn M Gundersen, Ellen Berget, Hans Kristian Haugland, Trond Bruun, Stian Kreken Almeland, Jürg Assmus, Eivind Rath, Anna Norrby-Teglund, Steinar Skrede, Knut Anders Mosevoll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ingunn M GundersenDepartment of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Ellen BergetDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Hans Kristian HauglandDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Trond BruunDepartment of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7441-8413
Stian Kreken AlmelandDepartment of Plastic, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, Norwegian National Burn Center, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Jürg AssmusCentre of Competence on Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Eivind RathDepartment of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Anna Norrby-TeglundCenter for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Steinar SkredeDepartment of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Knut Anders MosevollDepartment of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are severe diseases with high morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis is challenging. Several guidelines recommend tissue biopsies as an adjunct diagnostic in routine management, but neither biopsy sampling nor classification is standardized or validated. We studied the quality of tissue biopsy examination as part of routine diagnostics in NSTIs. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing surgery due to suspected NSTIs in which tissue biopsy was taken as part of routine management. Clinical data were reviewed. The biopsies were evaluated according to a proposed histopathologic classification system and independently assessed by 2 pathologists. Interrater reliability and diagnostic accuracy were determined. Results: Tissue biopsies from 75 patients were examined, 55 NSTIs and 20 non-NSTIs cases. The cohorts were similar in clinical characteristics. Interrater reliability for histopathologic staging was moderate (0.53) and fair (0.37) for diagnosis. The sensitivity of histologic diagnosis was 75% and the specificity 80%. The positive predictive value was 91% and the negative predictive value 53%. Necrotizing Infection Clinical Composite Endpoint (NICCE) success was associated with a more severe histological stage, achieved by 42% and 71% of the cases in stage 1 and 2, respectively ( Conclusions: Our findings suggest that tissue biopsies have low clinical accuracy. The interrater reliability among experienced pathologists is only fair to moderate. A histopathologically more severe stage was associated with favorable outcome. These findings discourage the use of histopathologic evaluation as part of contemporary management of patients with suspected NSTI.

Indexed as

histopathologynecrotizing soft tissue infectionsprognosisrapid diagnostic tool

Identifiers

PMID36381623
PMCPMC9648561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.