Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36381590›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of urology2022

Genitourinary manifestations of Lynch syndrome in the urological practice.

Chiara Lonati, Claudio Simeone, Nazareno Suardi, Philippe E Spiess, Andrea Necchi, Marco Moschini

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bladder cancer risk factors: a comprehensive umbrella review of meta-analyses.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Hereditary Renal Cancer Syndromes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Chiara LonatiUrology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Claudio SimeoneUrology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Nazareno SuardiUrology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Philippe E SpiessDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampla, FL, USA.
Andrea NecchiUniversity Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Marco MoschiniDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
University of Brescia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant hereditary disorder resulting from germline mutation in at least one of the four mismatch repair genes or in Methods: Previous literature was assessed through Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. A narrative review of the most relevant articles from January 1996 to June 2021 on urological manifestations of LS was provided. Results: In the LS tumor spectrum, upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents the third most frequent malignancy, and the first most common cancer in the urological field, with an approximately 14-fold increased risk of developing UTUC compared to general population. LS diagnosis among patients experiencing UTUC as first malignancy is a step-by-step process, including (i) clinical criteria, (ii) molecular testing, and (iii) genetic testing to confirm the hereditary disorder. The current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines recommend to perform molecular testing among UTUC patients under 65 years old, or UTUC patients with personal history of LS-related tumor, or UTUC patients with one first-degree relative under the age of 50 years with LS-related tumor, or UTUC patients with two first-degree relatives with LS-related tumor regardless of age of onset. Newly diagnosed LS patients should be referred to a multidisciplinary management, including gastroenterologists and gynecologists. Finally, considering the increased risk of metachronous recurrence, treatments other than radical nephroureterectomy may be a valuable therapeutic alternative. Whether urological malignancies other than UTUC should be included in the LS tumor spectrum is still controversial. Conclusion: Considering the strict association between UTUC and LS, we believe that the urologist should recognize patients at increased risk for hereditary disease according to current EAU clinical criteria and address them to a comprehensive diagnostic algorithm, including molecular evaluation and genetic testing. To date, literature lacks clear evidence regarding the role of LS in developing bladder cancer, prostate cancer, or renal cell carcinoma, and current data are still inconclusive, highlighting the urgent need for further studies.

Indexed as

Hereditary diseaseHereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancerLynch syndromeMismatch repairUpper tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID36381590
PMCPMC9643301
OpenAlexW4293767239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.