Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36381488›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022

Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty: A National Survey of Surgical Practice by Accredited Cleft Palate Teams.

Nikhil D Shah, Narainsai K Reddy, Joshua P Weissman, Jenna R Stoehr, Sarah A Applebaum, Arun K Gosain

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikhil D ShahDivision of Plastic Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Narainsai K ReddyDivision of Plastic Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Joshua P WeissmanDivision of Plastic Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Jenna R StoehrDivision of Plastic Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Sarah A ApplebaumDivision of Plastic Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Arun K GosainDivision of Plastic Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Lurie Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with cleft lip often undergo a primary rhinoplasty at the time of lip repair, and further surgical correction with secondary cleft rhinoplasty (SCR) is often warranted for improved form and function. The purpose of this study was to better elucidate current practice patterns and trends for how SCR is performed in the United States. Methods: We administered a survey to team surgeons affiliated with cleft lip and palate care teams approved by the American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association (ACPA). Results: We received responses from 40 ACPA-approved teams for a response rate of 20.7%, with 59 total ACPA team surgeons completing the survey. 88.1% of surgeons perform intermediate cleft rhinoplasties. Among those who perform an intermediate cleft rhinoplasty, the mean age at which they would first consider the procedure is 5.83±2.66 years. The mean age for consideration of definitive cleft rhinoplasty was 15.86 ± 1.73 years. In both unilateral and bilateral cleft lips, a closed approach was more common in intermediate rhinoplasty, while an open approach was more common in definitive rhinoplasty ( Conclusions: When comparing intermediate with definitive cleft rhinoplasty, we found significant increase in the use of open techniques, autologous cartilage use for augmentation of the nasal tip, dorsal nasal support, and columellar sup- port. The considerable variability among surgeons highlights the lack of consensus regarding SCR.

Identifiers

PMID36381488
PMCPMC9645790
OpenAlexW4309247805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.