ArticleKorean journal of neurotrauma2022
Clinical Outcome of Patients Diagnosed Traumatic Intracranial Epidural Hematoma With Severe Brain Injury (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8) Who Undergo Surgery: A Report From the Korean Neuro-Trauma Data Bank System.
Article in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computer tomography-based radiomics combined with machine learning for predicting the time since onset of epidural hematoma.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
- Pre-admission opioid use disorder as a new predictor of in-hospital mortality and six-month outcomes in traumatic brain injury patients: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Electric Scooter Falls: The 2023-2024 Experience in the Clinical Emergency Children's Hospital in Galați.Clinics and practice · 2024Review
- The importance of additional intracranial injuries in epidural hematomas: detailed clinical analysis, long-term outcome, and literature review in surgically managed epidural hematomas.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in surgically treated patients with severe brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤8) diagnosed with traumatic epidural hematoma (EDH). Methods: From January 2018 to June 2021, 1,122 patients with an initial GCS score ≤8 were retrospectively enrolled in the Korean Neuro-Trauma Data Bank System. Clinical data of 79 surgically treated patients with EDH were compared between the unfavorable (scores of 1-4 on the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended [GOSE]) and favorable (score of 5-8 on the GOSE) outcome groups. Results: The overall mortality rate was 13.9%, and 60.8% of the patients had good outcomes at six months post-trauma. In the univariate analysis, increasing age ( Conclusion: Despite severe brain injury, more than half of the patients with EDH had favorable outcomes after surgical treatment. Our findings suggest that prompt diagnosis and surgical treatment should be considered for such cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.