ArticleKorean journal of neurotrauma2022
The Relationship Between Trauma Scoring Systems and Outcomes in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Associated With Poor One-Month Glasgow Outcome Scale Scores After Traumatic Brain Injury With Intracranial Hemorrhage in Adult Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.Emergency medicine international · 2026Article
- Reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale score as a predictor of urgent trauma care and mortality in isolated severe traumatic brain injury: a 10-year nationwide validation study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of Inflammatory and Metabolic Biomarkers in ICU-Admitted Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Incidence and mortality related risk factors in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A meta‑analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
- External validation of an artificial intelligence model using clinical variables, including ICD-10 codes, for predicting in-hospital mortality among trauma patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score for Predicting Mortality among Older Korean Adults with Trauma: Is It Applicable in All Cases?Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2024Article
- Epidemiology and Outcomes of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Regional Trauma Center in Incheon, Korea, 2018-2022.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated the relationship between trauma scoring systems and outcomes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: From January 2018 to June 2021, 1,122 patients with severe TBI were registered in the Korean Neuro-Trauma Data Bank System. Among them, 697 patients with data on trauma scoring systems were included in the study. According to the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score, the patients were divided into unfavorable and favorable outcome groups. The abbreviated injury scale (AIS), injury severity score (ISS), revised trauma score (RTS), and trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) were evaluated. Results: The AIS head score was higher in the unfavorable outcome group than in the favorable outcome group (4.39 vs. 4.06, Conclusion: Trauma scoring systems, including ISS, RTS, and TRISS, provide tools for quantifying posttraumatic risk and can be used to predict prognosis. Among these, TRISS is an indicator of the predicted survival rate and is considered a clinically useful tool for predicting unfavorable and favorable outcomes in patients with severe TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.