Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36381390›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Using eDNA metabarcoding to understand the effect of fire on the diet of small mammals in a woodland ecosystem.

Saumya Wanniarachchi, Matthew Swan, Paul Nevil, Alan York

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saumya WanniarachchiSchool of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences The University of Melbourne Creswick Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2784-3334
Matthew SwanSchool of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences The University of Melbourne Creswick Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6878-476X
Paul NevilTrace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Life and Molecular Sciences Curtin University Perth Western Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8238-0534
Alan YorkSchool of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences The University of Melbourne Creswick Victoria Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUCurtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food acquisition is a fundamental process that drives animal distribution and abundance, influencing how species respond to changing environments. Disturbances such as fire create significant shifts in available dietary resources, yet, for many species, we lack basic information about what they eat, let alone how they respond to a changing resource base. In order to create effective management strategies, faunal conservation in flammable landscapes requires a greater understanding of what animals eat and how this change following a fire. What animals eat in postfire environments has received little attention due to the time-consuming methodologies and low-resolution identification of food taxa. Recently, molecular techniques have been developed to identify food DNA in scats, making it possible to identify animal diets with enhanced resolution. The primary aim of this study was to utilize eDNA metabarcoding to obtain an improved understanding of the diet of three native Australian small mammal species: yellow-footed antechinus (

Indexed as

environmental DNAfire regimepyrodiversityresource selectionscat

Identifiers

PMID36381390
PMCPMC9643072
OpenAlexW4308555818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.