ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2022
Sodium Balance Analysis In The Burn Resuscitation Period.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The different formulae for resuscitation therapy after thermal damage recommend 0.5-0.6 mmol sodium for each % TBSA burned, suggesting fluid requirements from 2-4 ml/kg/% burn because of sodium loss in burned and unburned tissues. There is a gap especially in the recommendations regarding dysnatremia in the burn population. Many studies have focused on calculating amount of resuscitation fluids, avoiding the situation of "fluid creep", and not on calculating sodium remaining in the body after resuscitation. The goal of this observational study was to provide data for sodium disturbances in the shock period after burns. Our study underscores the challenge of understanding whether there is a relationship between amount of crystalloid fluids given during resuscitation and meeting sodium needs. We set out to examine sodium balance (sodium deficit, received, excreted, and retained) after burns. The area under the ROC curve was performed by analyzing fluid and sodium load. Moreover, we conducted linear regression to analyze if there was a correlation between sodium retained and sodium excreted. Sodium deficit persisted until the second 24h despite resuscitation. Resuscitation was performed using Parkland formula, but urine output (UO) values were higher than expected. The threshold for fluid administration (ml/kg/%) or fluid load in the first 24h and sodium load (mmol/kg/%) for positive state (sodium received >0.5-0.6 mmol/kg/%) was 3.7 ml/kg/%. With linear regression, it was evident that sodium excreted was responsible for sodium retained, indicating a moderate correlation in the first 24h and a strong correlation in the second 24h. Resuscitation with LR did not correct hypoosmolality hyponatremia, which persisted even after the first 24h, especially in patients with burns >60%. If more than 3.7 ml/kg/% of LR is given, a sodium load higher than the normal level will be introduced, leading to increased urinary output, elevated sodium excretion, and non-correction of plasma sodium at the end of resuscitation. What is important for colleagues in clinical practice is that the focus of burn resuscitation should be expanded with data regarding sodium balance and the impact of dysnatremias in morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36381347PMC9416683W4309243025What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.