Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36381261›Full record

ArticleBMJ medicine2022

Association between menstrual cycle length and covid-19 vaccination: global, retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data.

Alison Edelman, Emily R Boniface, Victoria Male, Sharon T Cameron, Eleonora Benhar, Leo Han, Kristen A Matteson, Agathe Van Lamsweerde, Jack T Pearson, Blair G Darney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A Prospective Study of the Relationship of COVID-19 Vaccination to Menstrual Cycle Characteristics in Adolescent Girls.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Abnormal uterine bleeding diagnoses and care following COVID-19 vaccination.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison EdelmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5040-7288
Emily R BonifaceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Victoria MaleDepartment of Metabolism Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sharon T CameronReproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Eleonora BenharNatural Cycles USA Corp, New York, NY, USA.
Leo HanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Kristen A MattesonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Agathe Van LamsweerdeNatural Cycles USA Corp, New York, NY, USA.
Jack T PearsonNatural Cycles USA Corp, New York, NY, USA.
Blair G DarneyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USImperial College London · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Improving emergency contraceptive effectiveness in obese womenR01HD089957 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI EDELMAN, ALISON B · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD089957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify whether covid-19 vaccines are associated with menstrual changes in order to address concerns about menstrual cycle disruptions after covid-19 vaccination.

designGlobal, retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data.

settingInternational users of the menstrual cycle tracking application, Natural Cycles.

participants19 622 individuals aged 18-45 years with cycle lengths of 24-38 days and consecutive data for at least three cycles before and one cycle after covid (vaccinated group; n=14 936), and those with at least four consecutive cycles over a similar time period (unvaccinated group; n=4686).

main outcome measuresThe mean change within individuals was assessed by vaccination group for cycle and menses length (mean of three cycles before vaccination to the cycles after first and second dose of vaccine and the subsequent cycle). Mixed effects models were used to estimate the adjusted difference in change in cycle and menses length between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

resultsMost people (n=15 713; 80.08%) were younger than 35 years, from the UK (n=6222; 31.71%), US and Canada (28.59%), or Europe (33.55%). Two thirds (9929 (66.48%) of 14 936) of the vaccinated cohort received the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) covid-19 vaccine, 17.46% (n=2608) received Moderna (mRNA-1273), 9.06% (n=1353) received Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19), and 1.89% (n=283) received Johnson & Johnson (Ad26.COV2.S). Individuals who were vaccinated had a less than one day adjusted increase in the length of their first and second vaccine cycles, compared with individuals who were not vaccinated (0.71 day increase (99.3% confidence interval 0.47 to 0.96) for first dose; 0.56 day increase (0.28 to 0.84) for second dose). The adjusted difference was larger in people who received two doses in a cycle (3.70 days increase (2.98 to 4.42)). One cycle after vaccination, cycle length was similar to before the vaccine in individuals who received one dose per cycle (0.02 day change (99.3% confidence interval -0.10 to 0.14), but not yet for individuals who received two doses per cycle (0.85 day change (99.3% confidence interval 0.24 to 1.46)) compared with unvaccinated individuals. Changes in cycle length did not differ by the vaccine's mechanism of action (mRNA, adenovirus vector, or inactivated virus). Menses length was unaffected by vaccination.

conclusionsCovid-19 vaccination is associated with a small and likely to be temporary change in menstrual cycle length but no change in menses length.

Identifiers

PMID36381261
PMCPMC9665108
OpenAlexW4297318073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.