ArticleCentral European journal of urology2022
Perioperative and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy for locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a single-center cohort study.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative outcomes of multiport or single-port, transperitoneal or retroperitoneal robot assisted radical nephroureterectomy: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma with or without Kidney Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Minimally Invasive Radical Nephroureterectomy: 5-Year Update of Techniques and Outcomes.Cancers · 2023Review
- Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Open radical nephroureterectomy (ONU) is the standard of care for treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LNU) is increasingly being used due to better perioperative outcomes. However, its oncological safety remains controversial, in particular for advanced disease.We aimed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between surgical approaches in locally advanced UTUC (≥pT3 and/or pN+). Material and methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of all 48 patients submitted to radical nephroureterectomy for advanced UTUC between 2006 and 2020 in our center.Perioperative data were compared between groups. Bladder tumor-free survival (BTFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with log-rank p test. Multivariable Cox regression model was used to evaluate their association with surgical approach. Results: Clinical and pathological characteristics were similar between groups. LNU had lower blood loss (p = 0.031), need for transfusion (p = 0.013) and length of hospital stay (p <0.001), with similar operative time (p = 0.860).LNU was associated with better MFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.93, p = 0.033) and CSS (HR: 0.42, 95%CI 0.19-0.94, p = 0.036). Median time to cancer death was 41 months for LNU and 12 months for ONU (log-rank p = 0.029). BTFS was similar between groups (HR: 0.60, 95%CI 0.17-2.11, p = 0.427). On multivariable Cox regression model, surgical approach wasn't significantly associated with MFS (p = 0.202), CSS (p = 0.149) or BTFS (p = 0.586). Conclusions: In our cohort of advanced UTUC, LNU did not result in inferior oncological control compared to ONU. The minimally invasive approach conferred an advantage in perioperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.