ArticleInternational journal of heart failure2022
Real-World Usage of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Korea: A Multi-Center, Retrospective Study.
Article in International journal of heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ten years real-world experience with sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes according to the average daily dose of sacubitril/valsartan: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Predictors of reverse cardiac remodeling after sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors in concurrent heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and kidney failure.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Comparing High- Versus Low-Dose Entresto in Heart Failure Patients: A 2025 Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2025Review
- Article
- Long-term impact of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor based on short-term treatment response in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Clinical efficacy of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor in de novo heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2023Article
- Optimization of guideline-directed medical treatment for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2023Review
- Evaluation and Management of Patients With Diabetes and Heart Failure: A Korean Diabetes Association and Korean Society of Heart Failure Consensus Statement.International journal of heart failure · 2023Review
- Evaluation and Management of Patients with Diabetes and Heart Failure: A Korean Diabetes Association and Korean Society of Heart Failure Consensus Statement.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2023Review
- Drug Titration for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Is a Challenge for Physicians in the Era of Four Pillar Drugs.International journal of heart failure · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Differences in drug prescriptions exist between clinical trials and real-world practice. We evaluated the real-world treatment patterns of sacubitril/valsartan in Korean patients with heart failure (HF). Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter cohort study, 600 patients with HF with reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <40%) with ≥1 sacubitril/valsartan prescription were identified by reviewing patient-level medical records at six academic tertiary hospitals in Korea between February 2017 and April 2019. Results: At baseline, 59.2%, 28.3%, 4.8%, and 7.7% of the patients received low (50 mg bid), moderate (100 mg bid), target (200 mg bid), and unconventional dose of sacubitril/valsartan, respectively. Patients with low and moderate doses experienced either 'no-titration' (39.8%) or 'stable up-titration' (41.5%). At 12 months, 31.7%, 28.5%, 24.8%, and 15% received low, moderate, target doses, and unconventional dose, respectively. On follow-up, 31 (5.2%) patients discontinued sacubitril/valsartan. The time-averaged N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level decreased from 879.6 to 406 pg/mL (ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.5). The mean LVEF increased by 10.4±12.2% from 27.2±5.8 to 36.3±11.1%, whereas LV end-diastolic volume index decreased by 18.7±26.1 mL/m Conclusions: In real-world practice, 95% patients started with low and moderate doses of sacubitril/valsartan. Many patients experienced dose up-titration during follow-up; 30% reached the target dose. Cardiac reverse remodelling was reflected by a profound NT-proBNP level and LV size reduction, and LVEF increment. This study confirms the gap in treatment patterns between clinical trials and real-world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.