Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36381016›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of heart failure2022

Real-World Usage of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Korea: A Multi-Center, Retrospective Study.

Jin Joo Park, Sang-Eun Lee, Hyun-Jai Cho, Jin-Oh Choi, Byung-Su Yoo, Seok-Min Kang, Hsiang-Chi Wang, Sue Lee, Dong-Ju Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical outcomes according to the average daily dose of sacubitril/valsartan: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jin Joo ParkCardiovascular Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9611-1490
Sang-Eun LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7290-2463
Hyun-Jai ChoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2779-4037
Jin-Oh ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2441-2267
Byung-Su YooDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3395-4279
Seok-Min KangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-9227
Hsiang-Chi WangNorvartis Corporation Sdn. Bhd, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
Sue LeeNorvartis Korea Limited, Seoul, Korea.
Dong-Ju ChoiCardiovascular Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0146-2189

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Differences in drug prescriptions exist between clinical trials and real-world practice. We evaluated the real-world treatment patterns of sacubitril/valsartan in Korean patients with heart failure (HF). Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter cohort study, 600 patients with HF with reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <40%) with ≥1 sacubitril/valsartan prescription were identified by reviewing patient-level medical records at six academic tertiary hospitals in Korea between February 2017 and April 2019. Results: At baseline, 59.2%, 28.3%, 4.8%, and 7.7% of the patients received low (50 mg bid), moderate (100 mg bid), target (200 mg bid), and unconventional dose of sacubitril/valsartan, respectively. Patients with low and moderate doses experienced either 'no-titration' (39.8%) or 'stable up-titration' (41.5%). At 12 months, 31.7%, 28.5%, 24.8%, and 15% received low, moderate, target doses, and unconventional dose, respectively. On follow-up, 31 (5.2%) patients discontinued sacubitril/valsartan. The time-averaged N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level decreased from 879.6 to 406 pg/mL (ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.5). The mean LVEF increased by 10.4±12.2% from 27.2±5.8 to 36.3±11.1%, whereas LV end-diastolic volume index decreased by 18.7±26.1 mL/m Conclusions: In real-world practice, 95% patients started with low and moderate doses of sacubitril/valsartan. Many patients experienced dose up-titration during follow-up; 30% reached the target dose. Cardiac reverse remodelling was reflected by a profound NT-proBNP level and LV size reduction, and LVEF increment. This study confirms the gap in treatment patterns between clinical trials and real-world practice.

Indexed as

DosageHeart failureRemodelingTreatment pattern

Identifiers

PMID36381016
PMCPMC9634027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.