Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36380805›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2022

The percutaneous coronary angioplasty gets better, but the surgical coronary artery bypass does not stay behind.

Ruggero De Paulis, Giulio Folino, Raffaele Scaffa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruggero De PaulisDivision of Cardiac Surgery - European Hospital, and UniCamillus University, Rome.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3603-2202
Giulio FolinoDivision of Cardiac Surgery - European Hospital, and UniCamillus University, Rome.
Raffaele ScaffaDivision of Cardiac Surgery - European Hospital, and UniCamillus University, Rome.
Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting remains one of the most frequently performed cardiac operations, with well-established prognostic benefits in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and left main disease. Despite an increasingly higher patients' risk profile, the results of this procedure have significantly improved over time, with an evident and striking decrease in operative mortality and peri-operative complications. A fair amount of technical and technological refinements has further improved the short- and long-term results of coronary artery bypass surgery. The improvements in the beating heart coronary surgery and aortic 'no-touch' technique, in the appropriate use of conduits (bilateral internal mammary artery, radial artery, and composite conduits configuration), and in the optimization of venous grafts' patency are reviewed.

Indexed as

Coronary artery bypassGraft‘no-touch’ techniqueTotal arterial revascularization

Identifiers

PMID36380805
PMCPMC9653154
OpenAlexW4308841849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.