Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36380740›Full record

ArticleBiomarker insights2022

The Prognostic Value of Lung Injury and Fibrosis Markers, KL-6, TGF-β1, FGF-2 in COVID-19 Patients.

Hazan Karadeniz, Aslıhan Avanoğlu Güler, Hasan Selçuk Özger, Pınar Aysert Yıldız, Gonca Erbaş, Gülendam Bozdayı, Tuba Deveci Bulut, Özlem Gülbahar, Dilek Yapar, Hamit Küçük and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomarker insights, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hazan KaradenizDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4665-3421
Aslıhan Avanoğlu GülerDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Hasan Selçuk ÖzgerDepartment of Infectious Disease, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Pınar Aysert YıldızDepartment of Infectious Disease, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Gonca ErbaşDepartment of Radiology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Gülendam BozdayıDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Tuba Deveci BulutDepartment of Biochemistry, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Özlem GülbaharDepartment of Biochemistry, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Dilek YaparDepartment of Public Health and Biostatistics Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Hamit KüçükDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet Akif ÖztürkDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Abdurrahman TufanDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Gazi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biomarkers of lung injury and interstitial fibrosis give insight about the extent of involvement and prognosis in well-known interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) reflects direct alveolar injury and, transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) are principal mediators of fibrosis in ILD and in almost all fibrotic diseases. In this sense, we aimed to assess associations of these biomarkers with traditional inflammatory markers and clinical course of COVID-19. Methods: Patients with COVID-19 who had confirmed diagnosis with SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid RT-PCR were enrolled and followed up prospectively with a standardized approach one month after diagnosis. Patients were divided into severe and non-severe groups according to National Institutes of Health criteria. Outcome was assessed for the requirement of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, long term respiratory support and death. Blood samples were collected at enrollment and serum levels of KL-6, TGF-β1, FGF-2 were determined by ELISA. Association between these markers with other prognostic markers and prognosis were analyzed. Results: Overall 31 severe and 28 non-severe COVID-19 patients were enrolled and were compared with healthy control subjects (n = 30). Serum KL-6 levels in COVID-19 patients were significantly higher (median [IQR]; 11.54 [4.86] vs 8.54 [3.98] ng/mL, Conclusions: Serum KL-6 levels were significantly elevated at the diagnosis of COVID-19 and correlated well with the other traditional prognostic inflammatory markers. Serum levels of principal fibrosis mediators, TGF-β1, FGF-2, were not elevated at diagnosis of COVID-19, therefore did not help to anticipate long term prognosis.

Indexed as

biomarkercomputed tomographyCoronavirus disease 2019fibroblast growth factor-2Krebs von den Lungen-6transforming growth factor-beta1

Identifiers

PMID36380740
PMCPMC9643117
OpenAlexW4309245327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.