Observational studyEpilepsia2023
First-line levetiracetam versus enzyme-inducing antiseizure medication in glioma patients with epilepsy.
Observational study in Epilepsia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor-related epilepsy and preoperative cognitive performance in glioma: a preliminary study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Current Pharmacotherapeutic Strategies in Diffuse Gliomas: Focus on Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype, and Emerging Targeted Therapies for IDH-Mutant Tumors.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- State of the art: glioma-associated epilepsy-bridging tumor biology and epileptogenesis.Neurological research and practice · 2025Review
- Antiseizure medication choice in diffuse glioma: A single-center population-based experience.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Long-Term Follow-Up Results of Antiseizure Medication Withdrawal in Grade 2 and 3 Glioma Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.Neurology · 2025Observational
- Symptom management in isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant glioma.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Review
- Brain tumor-related epilepsy management: A Society for Neuro-oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management.Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Therapeutic Strategies to Ameliorate Neuronal Damage in Epilepsy by Regulating Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial Dysfunction, and Neuroinflammation.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- First-line levetiracetam versus enzyme-inducing antiseizure medication in glioma patients with epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to directly compare the effectiveness of first-line monotherapy levetiracetam (LEV) versus enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EIASMs) in glioma patients.
methodsIn this nationwide retrospective observational cohort study, Grade 2-4 glioma patients were included, with a maximum duration of follow-up of 36 months. Primary outcome was antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment failure for any reason, and secondary outcomes were treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures and due to adverse effects. For estimation of the association between ASM treatment and ASM treatment failure, multivariate cause-specific cox proportional hazard models were estimated, adjusting for potential confounders.
resultsIn the original cohort, a total of 808 brain tumor patients with epilepsy were included, of whom 109 glioma patients were prescribed first-line LEV and 183 glioma patients first-line EIASMs. The EIASM group had a significantly higher risk of treatment failure for any reason compared to LEV (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20-2.75, p = .005). Treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures did not differ significantly between EIASMs and LEV (aHR = 1.32, 95% CI = .78-2.25, p = .300), but treatment failure due to adverse effects differed significantly (aHR = 4.87, 95% CI = 1.89-12.55, p = .001). SIGNIFICANCE: In this study, it was demonstrated that LEV had a significantly better effectiveness (i.e., less ASM treatment failure for any reason or due to adverse effects) compared to EIASMs, supporting the current neuro-oncology guideline recommendations to avoid EIASMs in glioma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.