Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36380482›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2023

Evaluation of the (hu)MANid program for sex and ancestry estimation in a diverse, contemporary CT scan-based sample.

Matan Farhi, Natalie Tomas, Ian Marion, David Avenetti, Phimon Atsawasuwan, Marcio da Fonseca, Mustafa Al Atabbe, Christina L Nicholas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matan FarhiDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Natalie TomasDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ian MarionDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
David AvenettiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Phimon AtsawasuwanDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Marcio da FonsecaDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Mustafa Al AtabbeDepartment of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Christina L NicholasDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9462-6420

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human remains from forensic and bioarcheological contexts are often fragmentary, requiring methods for estimating a forensic profile that are based upon limited skeletal features. In 2017, Berg and Keryhercz created an online application, (hu)MANid, that provides sex and ancestry estimation from mandibular morphoscopic traits and linear measurements. In this study, we examine the utility of the (hu)MANid application in a diverse, urban US adult sample (aged 20-45; n = 143) derived from computed tomography (CT) scans. We secondarily conduct a preliminary analysis of the program's utility in a sample of adolescents (aged 15-17; n = 40). Six morphoscopic, and eleven morphometric traits were recorded as directed by the literature associated with the (hu)MANid program. Percent correct classification and posterior predictive values were calculated for the sex and ancestry estimations output by the program; chi-squared tests were employed to compare self-reported and predicted ancestry. In the adult sample, sex was accurately predicted for 75.52% of the sample. Ancestry prediction, however, was less favorable ranging from 19.3% to 50% correct. For the adolescent sample, correct sex estimation (45%) did not surpass what could occur by chance alone, though ancestry prediction fared better than in the larger adult sample (percent correct prediction overall average: 47.5%, range 35.71%-71.43%). The (hu)MANid application shows utility for use with CT scan-derived adult samples for sex estimation, but caution is warranted for ancestry estimation and use with samples that may not have reached full adult maturity.

Indexed as

Forensic AnthropologySex Determination by SkeletonAdolescentAdultForensic MedicineHumansMandibleTomography, X-Ray Computedancestry estimationforensic anthropologyhu(MAN)idsex estimation

Identifiers

PMID36380482
PMCPMC10100212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.