Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36380473›Full record

SynthesisJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2023

Quality of life measurement tools for people with dementia and intellectual disabilities: A systematic review.

Winnie Tsang, David Oliver, Paraskevi Triantafyllopoulou

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Enhancing quality of life measurement: adapting the ASCOT easy read for older adults accessing social care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Winnie TsangSchool of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1075-5426
David OliverSchool of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9302-3225
Paraskevi TriantafyllopoulouSchool of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0946-5088
University of Kent · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdults with intellectual disabilities are an at-risk group of developing dementia. In the absence of a cure for dementia, emphasis on treatment is the promotion of Quality of life (QoL). The aim of this review is to identify and describe QoL tools for people with intellectual disabilities and dementia.

methodA systematic review was carried out using 10 databases and papers from up to March year 2021.

resultsTwo instruments were identified and examined. The QoL in late-stage dementia, which showed evidence of good levels of internal consistency, intra-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity. The Dementia Quality of Life - proxy was also used; however, its psychometric properties have yet to be studied within the intellectual disabilities population.

conclusionIt is recommended instruments should be developed and psychometrically tested specifically for adults with intellectual disabilities and dementia to help inform policy makers, measure outcomes of interventions and personal outcomes.

Indexed as

DementiaIntellectual DisabilityAdultHumansPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesdementiaDown's syndromeintellectual disabilitiesquality of lifesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36380473
PMCPMC10099806
OpenAlexW4309115773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.