Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36380431›Full record

ArticleHealthcare informatics research2022

Development of a Standardized Curriculum for Nursing Informatics in Korea.

Myonghwa Park, Bonkhe Brian Dlamini, Jahyeon Kim, Min-Jung Kwak, Insook Cho, Mona Choi, Jisan Lee, Yul Ha Min, Bu Kyung Park, Seonah Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Myonghwa ParkCollege of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.
Bonkhe Brian DlaminiCollege of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.
Jahyeon KimCollege of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.
Min-Jung KwakCollege of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.
Insook ChoDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
Mona ChoiMo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Jisan LeeDepartment of Nursing Science, College of Life & Health Sciences, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea.
Yul Ha MinCollege of Nursing, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea.
Bu Kyung ParkCollege of Nursing, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Seonah LeeCollege of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.

Funding

Chungnam National University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study explored the current status of nursing informatics education in South Korea and developed a standardized curriculum for it.

methodsData were collected in two stages: first, an online survey conducted from December 2020 to February 2021 among 60 nursing schools to analyze the current status of nursing informatics education; and second, a two-round Delphi survey with 15 experts from March to April 2021 to determine the mean and standard deviation of the demand for each learning objective in nursing informatics education. A standardized curriculum proposal was developed based on the results of the two-round Delphi survey.

resultsNursing informatics was most commonly taught in the fourth year (34%), with two credits. The proportion of elective major subjects was high in undergraduate and graduate programs (77.4% and 78.6%, respectively), while the proportion of nursing informatics majors was low (21.4%). The curriculum developed included topics such as nursing information system-related concepts, definitions and components of healthcare information systems, electronic medical records, clinical decision support systems, mobile technology and health management, medical information standards, personal information protection and ethics, understanding of big data, use of information technology in evidence-based practice, use of information in community nursing, genome information usage, artificial intelligence clinical information systems, administrative management systems, and information technology nursing education.

conclusionsNursing informatics professors should receive ongoing training to obtain recent medical information. Further review and modification of the nursing informatics curriculum should be performed to ensure that it remains up-to-date with recent developments.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducationHealth Information SystemsNursing InformaticsNursing Schools

Identifiers

PMID36380431
PMCPMC9672496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.