ReviewBiomarker research2022
Bioinformatics tools and data resources for assay development of fluid protein biomarkers.
Review in Biomarker research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review Article: Biomarkers in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Towards Precision Medicine.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Data-driven evaluation of suitable immunogens for improved antibody selection.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- The GFAP proteoform puzzle: How to advance GFAP as a fluid biomarker in neurological diseases.Journal of neurochemistry · 2025Review
- Decision Tree for Protein Biomarker Selection for Clinical Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Unleashing the power of colloidal gold immunochromatographic assays for plant virus diagnostics.MethodsX · 2024Review
- DescribePROT in 2023: more, higher-quality and experimental annotations and improved data download options.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Proteome encoded determinants of protein sorting into extracellular vesicles.Journal of extracellular biology · 2024Article
- Methods to Discover and Validate Biofluid-Based Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Dementias.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023Article
- Miniaturized microarray-format digital ELISA enabled by lithographic protein patterning.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2023Article
- Deciphering Protein Secretion from the Brain to Cerebrospinal Fluid for Biomarker Discovery.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluid protein biomarkers are important tools in clinical research and health care to support diagnosis and to monitor patients. Especially within the field of dementia, novel biomarkers could address the current challenges of providing an early diagnosis and of selecting trial participants. While the great potential of fluid biomarkers is recognized, their implementation in routine clinical use has been slow. One major obstacle is the often unsuccessful translation of biomarker candidates from explorative high-throughput techniques to sensitive antibody-based immunoassays. In this review, we propose the incorporation of bioinformatics into the workflow of novel immunoassay development to overcome this bottleneck and thus facilitate the development of novel biomarkers towards clinical laboratory practice. Due to the rapid progress within the field of bioinformatics many freely available and easy-to-use tools and data resources exist which can aid the researcher at various stages. Current prediction methods and databases can support the selection of suitable biomarker candidates, as well as the choice of appropriate commercial affinity reagents. Additionally, we examine methods that can determine or predict the epitope - an antibody's binding region on its antigen - and can help to make an informed choice on the immunogenic peptide used for novel antibody production. Selected use cases for biomarker candidates help illustrate the application and interpretation of the introduced tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.