Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36380299›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2022

A randomised controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy plus usual care compared to usual care alone for improving psychological health in people with motor neuron disease (COMMEND): study protocol.

Rebecca L Gould, Benjamin J Thompson, Charlotte Rawlinson, Pavithra Kumar, David White, Marc A Serfaty, Christopher D Graham, Lance M McCracken, Matt Bursnall, Mike Bradburn and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Post-stroke emotionalism: Diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca L GouldDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, 6th floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, W1T 7NF, London, UK. r.gould@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-1626
Benjamin J ThompsonClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Charlotte RawlinsonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, 6th floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, W1T 7NF, London, UK.
Pavithra KumarClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
David WhiteClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Marc A SerfatyDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, 6th floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, W1T 7NF, London, UK.
Christopher D GrahamSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Lance M McCrackenDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Matt BursnallClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Mike BradburnClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Tracey YoungSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Robert J HowardDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, 6th floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, W1T 7NF, London, UK.
Ammar Al-ChalabiMaurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Laura H GoldsteinDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Vanessa LawrenceHealth Services & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Cindy CooperClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Pamela J ShawSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Christopher J McDermottSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
University of Sheffield · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College London · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBThe Priory Hospital · GBUppsala University · SE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R024804/1Motor Neurone Disease Association 914225Motor Neurone Disease Association ALCHALABI-DOBSON/APR14/829-791Motor Neurone Disease Association GOULD/JUL17/936-794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMotor neuron disease (MND) is a rapidly progressive, fatal neurodegenerative disease that predominantly affects motor neurons from the motor cortex to the spinal cord and causes progressive wasting and weakening of bulbar, limb, abdominal and thoracic muscles. Prognosis is poor and median survival is 2-3 years following symptom onset. Psychological distress is relatively common in people living with MND. However, formal psychotherapy is not routinely part of standard care within MND Care Centres/clinics in the UK, and clear evidence-based guidance on improving the psychological health of people living with MND is lacking. Previous research suggests that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may be particularly suitable for people living with MND and may help improve their psychological health.

aimsTo assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of ACT modified for MND plus usual multidisciplinary care (UC) in comparison to UC alone for improving psychological health in people living with MND.

methodsThe COMMEND trial is a multi-centre, assessor-blind, parallel, two-arm RCT with a 10-month internal pilot phase. 188 individuals aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of definite, laboratory-supported probable, clinically probable, or possible familial or sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and additionally the progressive muscular atrophy and primary lateral sclerosis variants, will be recruited from approximately 14 UK-based MND Care Centres/clinics and via self-referral. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive up to eight 1:1 sessions of ACT plus UC or UC alone by an online randomisation system. Participants will complete outcome measures at baseline and at 6- and 9-months post-randomisation. The primary outcome will be quality of life at six months. Secondary outcomes will include depression, anxiety, psychological flexibility, health-related quality of life, adverse events, ALS functioning, survival at nine months, satisfaction with therapy, resource use and quality-adjusted life years. Primary analyses will be by intention to treat and data will be analysed using multi-level modelling. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide definitive evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of ACT plus UC in comparison to UC alone for improving psychological health in people living with MND.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN12655391. Registered 17 July 2017, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12655391 . PROTOCOL VERSION: 3.1 (10/06/2020).

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyMotor Neuron DiseaseNeurodegenerative DiseasesCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAcceptance and Commitment TherapyMotor neuron diseasePsychological healthQuality of lifeRCT

Identifiers

PMID36380299
PMCPMC9664029
OpenAlexW4309323790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.