ArticleJournal of medical systems2022
DataSifterText: Partially Synthetic Text Generation for Sensitive Clinical Notes.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pedagogical Efficacy of LLM-Generated Synthetic Data Versus Real-World Clinical Records: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Trial
- Synthetic Medical Data vs. The Four Principles: Ethical Trade-Offs and Zombie Data.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Article
- Linguistic Fidelity and Classification Performance of Large Language Models for Generating Synthetic Operative Notes: Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Medical data sharing and synthetic clinical data generation - maximizing biomedical resource utilization and minimizing participant re-identification risks.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A review on generative AI models for synthetic medical text, time series, and longitudinal data.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The Impact of Collaborative Documentation on Person-Centered Care: Textual Analysis of Clinical Notes.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Synthetic Health Data: Real Ethical Promise and Peril.The Hastings Center report · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Petabytes of health data are collected annually across the globe in electronic health records (EHR), including significant information stored as unstructured free text. However, the lack of effective mechanisms to securely share clinical text has inhibited its full utilization. We propose a new method, DataSifterText, to generate partially synthetic clinical free-text that can be safely shared between stakeholders (e.g., clinicians, STEM researchers, engineers, analysts, and healthcare providers), limiting the re-identification risk while providing significantly better utility preservation than suppressing or generalizing sensitive tokens. The method creates partially synthetic free-text data, which inherits the joint population distribution of the original data, and disguises the location of true and obfuscated words. Under certain obfuscation levels, the resulting synthetic text was sufficiently altered with different choices, orders, and frequencies of words compared to the original records. The differences were comparable to machine-generated (fully synthetic) text reported in previous studies. We applied DataSifterText to two medical case studies. In the CDC work injury application, using privacy protection, 60.9-86.5% of the synthetic descriptions belong to the same cluster as the original descriptions, demonstrating better utility preservation than the naïve content suppressing method (45.8-85.7%). In the MIMIC III application, the generated synthetic data maintained over 80% of the original information regarding patients' overall health conditions. The reported DataSifterText statistical obfuscation results indicate that the technique provides sufficient privacy protection (low identification risk) while preserving population-level information (high utility).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.