Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36380243›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2023

Quantitative measurement of cartilage morphology in osteoarthritis: current knowledge and future directions.

Wolfgang Wirth, Christoph Ladel, Susanne Maschek, Anna Wisser, Felix Eckstein, Frank Roemer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exercise-Induced Changes in Knee Cartilage In Vivo: Comparing MRI Sequences.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Wolfgang WirthDepartment of Imaging & Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. wolfgang.wirth@pmu.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2297-8283
Christoph LadelCHL4special Consultancy, Darmstadt, Germany.
Susanne MaschekDepartment of Imaging & Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Anna WisserDepartment of Imaging & Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Felix EcksteinDepartment of Imaging & Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Frank RoemerQuantitative Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Paracelsus Medical University · ATBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative measures of cartilage morphology ("cartilage morphometry") extracted from high resolution 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences have been shown to be sensitive to osteoarthritis (OA)-related change and also to treatment interventions. Cartilage morphometry is therefore nowadays widely used as outcome measure for observational studies and randomized interventional clinical trials. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the current status of cartilage morphometry in OA research, to provide insights into aspects relevant for the design of future studies and clinical trials, and to give an outlook on future developments. It covers the aspects related to the acquisition of MRIs suitable for cartilage morphometry, the analysis techniques needed for deriving quantitative measures from the MRIs, the quality assurance required for providing reliable cartilage measures, and the appropriate participant recruitment criteria for the enrichment of study cohorts with knees likely to show structural progression. Finally, it provides an overview over recent clinical trials that relied on cartilage morphometry as a structural outcome measure for evaluating the efficacy of disease-modifying OA drugs (DMOAD).

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingOutcome Assessment, Health CareCartilage lossKneeMRIOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID36380243
PMCPMC10509082
OpenAlexW4309162762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.