Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36379995›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Ursodeoxycholic acid use in lactating female patients is associated with clinically negligible concentrations of this bile acid in breast milk.

Patrik Šimják, Tomáš Petr, Barbora Kaslová, Tomáš Fejfar, Petr Hůlek, Antonín Pařízek, Libor Vítek

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Preexisting Liver Disease and Pregnancy: Optimizing Care to Optimize Outcomes.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patrik ŠimjákDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, General University Hospital in Prague and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomáš PetrInstitute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, General University Hospital in Prague and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Barbora KaslováDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, General University Hospital in Prague and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomáš FejfarDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital in Hradec Králové and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Petr HůlekDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital in Hradec Králové and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Antonín PařízekDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, General University Hospital in Prague and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Libor VítekInstitute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, General University Hospital in Prague and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. vitek@cesnet.cz.
General University Hospital in Prague · CZUniversity Hospital Hradec Králové · CZCharles University · CZ

Funding

European Union - Next Generation EU LX22NPO5104Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky CZ-DRO-VFN64165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the literature on the safety of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) during breastfeeding, insufficient data has been reported to date. Thus, the aim of our study was to analyze bile acid (BA) concentrations in breast milk in a cohort of patients, treated with UDCA, and with various cholestatic liver diseases. The study was carried out on a cohort of 20 patients with various cholestatic diseases. All the patients were treated with UDCA (500-1500 mg daily). Concentrations of BA, sampled on day 3 after delivery were analyzed using the GS-MS technique, and then compared to untreated women. Total BA concentrations in the breast milk of the UDCA-treated patients were equal to those of the untreated women controls (3.2 ± 1 vs. 3.2 ± 0.2 µmol/L, respectively). The UDCA concentrations in breast milk remained negligible in UDCA-treated patients (0.69 µmol/L), and in any event did not contribute to the newborn BA pool. No apparent side-effects of the maternal UDCA treatment were observed in any newborn infant, and no deterioration in postnatal development was observed during the routine 1-year follow-ups. Therapeutic administration of UDCA during lactation is safe for breastfed babies since UDCA only gets into breast milk in negligible amounts. UDCA treatment should be allowed and included into the guidelines for the therapy of cholestatic diseases in breastfeeding mothers.

Indexed as

CholestasisUrsodeoxycholic AcidBile Acids and SaltsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLactationMilk, HumanBile Acids and SaltsUrsodeoxycholic Acid

Identifiers

PMID36379995
PMCPMC9666662
OpenAlexW4309197512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.