Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36379979›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Source discrimination of mine water based on the random forest method.

Zhenwei Yang, Hang Lv, Zhaofeng Xu, Xinyi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhenwei YangInstitute of Resources and Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454000, China.
Hang LvInstitute of Resources and Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454000, China.
Zhaofeng XuInstitute of Resources and Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454000, China.
Xinyi WangInstitute of Resources and Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454000, China. wangxy@hpu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 41972254Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province 202300410179the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province NSFRF200337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning is one of the widely used techniques to pattern recognition. Use of the machine learning tools is becoming a more accessible approach for predictive model development in preventing engineering disaster. The objective of the research is to for estimation of water source using the machine learning tools. Random forest classification is a popular machine learning method for developing prediction models in many research settings. The type of mine water in the Pingdingshan coalfield is classified into surface water, Quaternary pore water, Carboniferous limestone karst water, Permian sandstone water, and Cambrian limestone karst water. Each type of water is encoded with the number 0-4. On the basis of hydrochemical data processing, a random forests model is designed and trained with the hydrochemical data. With respect to the predictive accuracy and robustness, fourfold cross-validation (CV) is adopted for the model training. The results show that the random forests model presented here provides significant guidance for the discrimination of mine water.

Indexed as

Machine LearningWaterCalcium CarbonateCalcium CarbonateWater

Identifiers

PMID36379979
PMCPMC9666470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.