Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36379963›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Use of synthetic images for training a deep learning model for weed detection and biomass estimation in cotton.

Bishwa B Sapkota, Sorin Popescu, Nithya Rajan, Ramon G Leon, Chris Reberg-Horton, Steven Mirsky, Muthukumar V Bagavathiannan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bishwa B SapkotaDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Sorin PopescuDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Nithya RajanDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Ramon G LeonDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Chris Reberg-HortonDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Steven MirskySustainable Agricultural Systems Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
Muthukumar V BagavathiannanDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. muthu@tamu.edu.

Funding

USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service- Conservation Innovation Grant (NRCS-CIG) NR213A750013G017USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service- Conservation Innovation Grant (NRCS-CIG) program NR213A750013G031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Site-specific treatment of weeds in agricultural landscapes has been gaining importance in recent years due to economic savings and minimal impact on the environment. Different detection methods have been developed and tested for precision weed management systems, but recent developments in neural networks have offered great prospects. However, a major limitation with the neural network models is the requirement of high volumes of data for training. The current study aims at exploring an alternative approach to the use of real images to address this issue. In this study, synthetic images were generated with various strategies using plant instances clipped from UAV-borne real images. In addition, the Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) technique was used to generate fake plant instances which were used in generating synthetic images. These images were used to train a powerful convolutional neural network (CNN) known as "Mask R-CNN" for weed detection and segmentation in a transfer learning mode. The study was conducted on morningglories (MG) and grass weeds (Grass) infested in cotton. The biomass for individual weeds was also collected in the field for biomass modeling using detection and segmentation results derived from model inference. Results showed a comparable performance between the real plant-based synthetic image (mean average precision for mask-mAP

Indexed as

Deep LearningBiomassCrops, AgriculturalGossypiumImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerPlant WeedsPoaceae

Identifiers

PMID36379963
PMCPMC9666527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.