ReviewNature communications2022
The history of sexual selection research provides insights as to why females are still understudied.
Review in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Synthesis of Nature's Extravaganza: An Augmented Meta-Meta-Analysis on (Putative) Sexual Signals.Ecology letters · 2025Pooled it
- Drivers of Taxonomic Bias in Ecology and Evolution: Insights From Ethologists and Behavioural Ecologists.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- A novel female reproductive organ differentiates insemination and postmating responses in bedbugs.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Inclusive Biology Curriculum Interventions can Reduce High School Students' Bioessentialist Beliefs.CBE life sciences education · 2026Article
- Solo songs, duets and territory defence across seasons in female Galápagos yellow warblers,Animal behaviour · 2026Article
- Navigating the Semantic Labyrinth of "Sex" in the Study of Reproductive Trait Evolution.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Hidden in plain sound: the scientific potential of house mouse squeaks.Biology letters · 2025Review
- Salivary/Serum Progesterone Ratio Differs Between Menstrual Cycle Phases but Not Between Populations: Implications for Health, Reproductive, and Behavioral Research.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025Article
- Monogamy removes constraints on reproductive tissue investment imposed by intense sexual selection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The 'silent' half: diversity, function and the critical knowledge gap on female frog vocalizations.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Is variation in female aggressiveness acrossProceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Ancestral neural circuits potentiate the origin of a female sexual behavior in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Maternal risk-management elucidates the evolution of reproductive adaptations in sharks by means of natural selection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- How Do Students Critically Evaluate Outdated Language That Relates to Gender in Biology?CBE life sciences education · 2024Article
- Eviction-driven infanticide and sexually selected adoption and infanticide in a neotropical parrot.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- New estimates indicate that males are not larger than females in most mammal species.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Long-term effects of neonatal pain and sucrose treatment.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2024Article
- Ancestral neural circuits potentiate the origin of a female sexual behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Widow spiders alter web architecture and attractiveness in response to same-sex competition for prey and mates, and predation risk.Communications biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While it is widely acknowledged that Darwin's descriptions of females were gender-biased, gender bias in current sexual selection research is less recognized. An examination of the history of sexual selection research shows prevalent male precedence-that research starts with male-centered investigations or explanations and thereafter includes female-centered equivalents. In comparison, the incidence of female precedence is low. Furthermore, a comparison between the volume of publications focusing on sexual selection in males versus in females shows that the former far outnumber the latter. This bias is not only a historical pattern; sexual selection theory and research are still male-centered-due to conspicuous traits, practical obstacles, and continued gender bias. Even the way sexual selection is commonly defined contributes to this bias. This history provides an illustrative example by which we can learn to recognize biases and identify gaps in knowledge. I conclude with a call for the scientific community to interrogate its own biases and suggest strategies for alleviating biases in this field and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.