Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36379943›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Prediction of inter-chain distance maps of protein complexes with 2D attention-based deep neural networks.

Zhiye Guo, Jian Liu, Jeffrey Skolnick, Jianlin Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. AI protocol for retrieving protein dynamic structures from two-dimensional infrared spectra.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhiye GuoDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5598-4834
Jian LiuDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Jeffrey SkolnickSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-200, USA.
Jianlin ChengDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. chengji@missouri.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0305-2853

Funding

Purchase of a GPU cluster for deep learning applications in protein-protein interaction and supercomplex prediction and biochemical literature annotation.R35GM118039 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI JEFFREY SKOLNICK · 2016 to 2026
$5.8M
Integrated Prediction of Protein Struture at 1D, 2D and 3D LevelsR01GM093123 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI CHENG, JIANLIN · 2010 to 2023
$3.8M
Deep learning methods for automated and accurate reconstruction of protein structures from cryo-EM image dataR01GM146340 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI CHENG, JIANLIN · 2022 to 2025
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093123NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM146340NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residue-residue distance information is useful for predicting tertiary structures of protein monomers or quaternary structures of protein complexes. Many deep learning methods have been developed to predict intra-chain residue-residue distances of monomers accurately, but few methods can accurately predict inter-chain residue-residue distances of complexes. We develop a deep learning method CDPred (i.e., Complex Distance Prediction) based on the 2D attention-powered residual network to address the gap. Tested on two homodimer datasets, CDPred achieves the precision of 60.94% and 42.93% for top L/5 inter-chain contact predictions (L: length of the monomer in homodimer), respectively, substantially higher than DeepHomo's 37.40% and 23.08% and GLINTER's 48.09% and 36.74%. Tested on the two heterodimer datasets, the top Ls/5 inter-chain contact prediction precision (Ls: length of the shorter monomer in heterodimer) of CDPred is 47.59% and 22.87% respectively, surpassing GLINTER's 23.24% and 13.49%. Moreover, the prediction of CDPred is complementary with that of AlphaFold2-multimer.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyNeural Networks, ComputerProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID36379943
PMCPMC9666547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.