Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36379940›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2022

Stronger gut microbiome modulatory effects by postbiotics than probiotics in a mouse colitis model.

Tao Zhang, Weiqin Zhang, Cuijiao Feng, Lai-Yu Kwok, Qiuwen He, Zhihong Sun

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Preventive Effects of Probiotic and PostbioticJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. InactivatedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Postbiotics: an insightful review of the latest category in functional biotics.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tao Zhang *Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 010018, Hohhot, P. R. China.
Weiqin Zhang *Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 010018, Hohhot, P. R. China.
Cuijiao FengKey Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 010018, Hohhot, P. R. China.
Lai-Yu KwokKey Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 010018, Hohhot, P. R. China.
Qiuwen HeKey Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 010018, Hohhot, P. R. China. heidyww@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5597-9656
Zhihong SunKey Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 010018, Hohhot, P. R. China. sunzhihong78@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7605-2048
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31972083National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32001711Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (Inner Mongolian Natural Science Foundation) 2020ZD12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics are increasingly used as adjunctive therapy to manage gastrointestinal diseases, such as ulcerative colitis. However, probiotic use has posed some safety concerns. Thus, postbiotics are proposed as alternatives to probiotics in clinical applications. However, no study has directly compared the clinical benefits of probiotics and postbiotics. This study compared the beneficial effect of postbiotics and probiotics derived from the strain, Bifidobacterium adolescentis B8598, in a dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced experimental colitis mouse model. Four groups of mice (n = 7 per group) were included in this work: Control (received water plus saline), DSS (received DSS without postbiotic/probiotic), Postbiotic (received DSS plus postbiotic), and Probiotic (received DSS plus probiotic). Our results showed that intragastric administration of both probiotic and postbiotic ameliorated colitis, reflected by decreased histology scores in Postbiotic and Probiotic groups compared with DSS group (P < 0.05). The fecal microbiota alpha diversity was not significantly affected by DSS-, postbiotic, or probiotic treatment. However, the postbiotic treatment showed stronger effects on modulating the fecal microbiota beta diversity, composition, and metagenomic potential than the probiotic treatment. Overall, our findings suggested that probiotics and postbiotics had similar ability to improve disease phenotype but had distinct ability to regulate the gut microbiota and metabolic pathways in the context of ulcerative colitis. In view of the smaller safety concern of postbiotics compared with probiotics and its stronger modulatory effect on the host gut microbiota, we propose that postbiotics are to be considered for use as next-generation biotherapeutics in managing ulcerative colitis or even other diseases.

Identifiers

PMID36379940
PMCPMC9666507
OpenAlexW4309110259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.