Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36379868›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology focus2023

Effect of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Emitted by Modern Cellphones on Sperm Motility and Viability: An In Vitro Study.

Kevin Y Chu, Kajal Khodamoradi, Ruben Blachman-Braun, Alexandra Dullea, Joginder Bidhan, Katherine Campbell, John Zizzo, Joseph Israeli, Mitch Kim, Francis Petrella and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology focus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin Y ChuDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Kajal KhodamoradiDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Ruben Blachman-BraunDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Alexandra DulleaDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Joginder BidhanDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Katherine CampbellDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
John ZizzoDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Joseph IsraeliDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Mitch KimDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Francis PetrellaDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Emad IbrahimDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Ranjith RamasamyDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: ranjithrama@gmail.com.
University of Miami · US

Funding

NICHD NIH HHS L50 HD077731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCellphones emit radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) for transmission of data for social media communication, web browsing, and music/podcast streaming. Use of Bluetooth ear buds has probably prolonged the time during which cellphones reside in the trouser pockets of men. It has been postulated that RF-EMR increases oxidative stress and induces free radical formation.

objectiveTo investigate the effect of wireless-spectrum (4G, 5G, and WiFi) RF-EMR emitted by modern smartphones on sperm motility and viability and explore whether these effects can be mitigated using a physical barrier or distance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsSemen samples were obtained from fertile normozoospermic men aged 25-35 yr. A current-generation smartphone in talk mode was used as the RF-EMR source. A WhatsApp voice call was made using either 4G, 5G, or WiFi wireless connectivity. We determined if exposure effects were mitigated by either a cellphone case or greater distance from the semen sample. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The semen samples were analyzed according to 2010 World Health Organization laboratory guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.28. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We observed decreases in sperm motility and viability with WiFi exposure but not with exposure to 4G or 5G RF-EMR. With large variability among smartphones, continued research on exposure effects is needed.

conclusionsOur exploratory study revealed that sperm motility and viability are negatively impacted by smartphones that use the WiFi spectrum for data transmission. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the effect of cellphone use on sperm motility and viability. We found that cellphones using WiFi connectivity for data usage have harmful effects on semen quality in men.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneSperm MotilityElectromagnetic RadiationHumansMaleRadio WavesSemen AnalysisCellphonesEnvironmental pollutantsMale fertilityRadiofrequency electromagnetic radiationSperm

Identifiers

PMID36379868
PMCPMC9928907
OpenAlexW4309079350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.