Sharing genomic data for health research: institutional trust and trustworthiness, and informed consent.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Underrepresented populations in genomic research: a qualitative study of researchers' perspectives.BMC medical genomics · 2025
   Article
2. Bridging the gap: understanding the perspective of healthcare professional students towards precision medicine in a Nigerian tertiary institution (a cross-sectional study).BMC medical education · 2025
   Article
3. Perceptions of Nigerian medical students regarding their preparedness for precision medicine: a cross-sectional survey in Lagos, Nigeria.BMC medical education · 2023
   Article
4. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien
   Article
5. Consent forms used by patient assistance programs raise privacy concerns.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Core elements of participant consent documents for Canadian human genomics research and the National Human Genome Library: guidance for policy.2022

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as