Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36378929›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiac surgery2022

Cardiovascular mechanism of donor brain death and heart recipient survival.

Christopher W Jensen, Oliver K Jawitz, Abigail R Benkert, Philip J Spencer, Benjamin S Bryner, Jacob N Schroder, Carmelo A Milano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiac surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher W JensenDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4313-9438
Oliver K JawitzDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Abigail R BenkertDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Philip J SpencerDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Benjamin S BrynerDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jacob N SchroderDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Carmelo A MilanoDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

American Heart Association
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart donation after donor brain death from cardiac arrest despite successful resuscitation may be associated with worse recipient outcomes due to potential graft ischemia or underlying rhythmic/structural defects. However, selected grafts from such donors often have normal cardiac function and anatomy. We investigated whether a cardiovascular mechanism of donor brain death (CV-DBD) was associated with worse recipient outcomes.

methodsWe queried the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database for first-time, single-organ, adult (age 18+) heart transplant recipients and their associated donors between January 2005 and March 2021. Recipients were stratified by donor status (CV-DBD vs. non-CV-DBD). We performed multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling to ascertain whether receiving a CV-DBD graft was independently associated with mortality.

resultsOf 35,833 included recipients, 2,702 (7.5%) received CV-DBD grafts. The associated donors were significantly more likely to be female, older, and have a history of diabetes, hypertension, and substance use (all p < .001). On unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis, CV-DBD recipients had a significantly reduced median survival than non-CV-DBD recipients (12.0 vs. 13.1 years, log-rank p = .04). However, after adjusting for donor/recipient age, recipient comorbidities, annualized center volume, and transplantation era, CV-DBD organ status was not associated with recipient mortality (hazard ratio: 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.96-1.13, p = .28).

conclusionIn this analysis of over 35,000 heart transplants, CV-DBD status was not associated with adjusted recipient survival. Donor brain death due to cardiac arrest should not be an absolute contraindication to heart donation, although graft function should be carefully assessed before transplantation.

Indexed as

Heart ArrestKidney TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementAdolescentAdultBrain DeathDeathFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTissue Donorsdonor cardiac arrestheart transplantationprimary cardiac arrestrecipient outcomes

Identifiers

PMID36378929
OpenAlexW4309087715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.