ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2023
Hemispheric Asymmetries of Individual Differences in Functional Connectivity.
Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aerobic walking exercise training boosts thalamic connectivity in MS patients with cognitive processing speed impairment.Brain and cognition · 2025Trial
- Commonality and Variability in Functional Networks in Children Under 5 Years Old.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Identifying left and right hemispheres using functional connectivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Precision functional mapping reveals less inter-individual variability in the child vs. adult human brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Insight predicts subsequent memory via cortical representational change and hippocampal activity.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Variation in brain aging: A review and perspective on the utility of individualized approaches to the study of functional networks in aging.Neurobiology of aging · 2025Review
- Evidence for a compensatory relationship between left- and right-lateralized brain networks.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Resting state neurophysiology of agonist-antagonist myoneural interface in persons with transtibial amputation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evidence for a Compensatory Relationship between Left- and Right-Lateralized Brain Networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Language network lateralization is reflected throughout the macroscale functional organization of cortex.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resting-state fMRI studies have revealed that individuals exhibit stable, functionally meaningful divergences in large-scale network organization. The locations with strongest deviations (called network "variants") have a characteristic spatial distribution, with qualitative evidence from prior reports suggesting that this distribution differs across hemispheres. Hemispheric asymmetries can inform us on constraints guiding the development of these idiosyncratic regions. Here, we used data from the Human Connectome Project to systematically investigate hemispheric differences in network variants. Variants were significantly larger in the right hemisphere, particularly along the frontal operculum and medial frontal cortex. Variants in the left hemisphere appeared most commonly around the TPJ. We investigated how variant asymmetries vary by functional network and how they compare with typical network distributions. For some networks, variants seemingly increase group-average network asymmetries (e.g., the group-average language network is slightly bigger in the left hemisphere and variants also appeared more frequently in that hemisphere). For other networks, variants counter the group-average network asymmetries (e.g., the default mode network is slightly bigger in the left hemisphere, but variants were more frequent in the right hemisphere). Intriguingly, left- and right-handers differed in their network variant asymmetries for the cingulo-opercular and frontoparietal networks, suggesting that variant asymmetries are connected to lateralized traits. These findings demonstrate that idiosyncratic aspects of brain organization differ systematically across the hemispheres. We discuss how these asymmetries in brain organization may inform us on developmental constraints of network variants and how they may relate to functions differentially linked to the two hemispheres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.