Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36378803›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2023

Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design.

George H Crossley, Prashanthan Sanders, Paolo De Filippo, Khaldoun G Tarakji, Bert Hansky, Maully Shah, Pamela Mason, Baerbel Maus, Keith Holloman

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. [ICD electrode implantation for left bundle branch area pacing].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Sensing and detection performance of the novel, small-diameter OmniaSecure defibrillation lead: in-depth analysis from the LEADR trial.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Therapeutic potential of conduction system pacing as a method for improving cardiac output during ventricular tachycardia.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

George H CrossleyVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0096-8401
Prashanthan SandersRoyal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3803-8429
Paolo De FilippoAzienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Khaldoun G TarakjiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Bert HanskyStädtische Kliniken, Bielefeld, Germany.
Maully ShahThe Children's Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Pamela MasonUniversity of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Baerbel MausBakken Research Center, Medtronic Inc., Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Keith HollomanMedtronic, Inc., Mounds View, Minnesota, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USCleveland Clinic · USKlinikum Bielefeld · DEMedtronic (Netherlands) · NLMedtronic (United States) · USOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITRoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUUniversity of Virginia Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are indicated for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. Despite enhancements in design and technologies, the ICD lead is the most vulnerable component of the ICD system and failure of ICD leads remains a significant clinical problem. A novel, small-diameter, lumenless, catheter-delivered, defibrillator lead was developed with the aim to improve long-term reliability. METHODS AND

resultsThe Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability (LEADR) study is a multi-center, single-arm, Bayesian, adaptive design, pre-market interventional pivotal clinical study. Up to 60 study sites from around the world will participate in the study. Patients indicated for a de novo ICD will undergo defibrillation testing at implantation and clinical assessments at baseline, implant, pre-hospital discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter until official study closure. Patients may be participating for a minimum of 18 months to approximately 3 years. Fracture-free survival will be evaluated using a Bayesian statistical method that incorporates both virtual patient data (combination of bench testing to failure with in-vivo use condition data) with clinical patients. The clinical subject sample size will be determined using decision rules for number of subject enrollments and follow-up time based upon the observed number of fractures at certain time points in the study. The adaptive study design will therefore result in a minimum of 500 and a maximum of 900 patients enrolled.

conclusionThe LEADR Clinical Study was designed to efficiently provide evidence for short- and long-term safety and efficacy of a novel lead design using Bayesian methods including a novel virtual patient approach.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableHeart ArrestBayes TheoremDeath, Sudden, CardiacHumansReproducibility of ResultsTreatment Outcomeadaptive designdefibrillation leadvirtual patient modeling

Identifiers

PMID36378803
PMCPMC10107290
OpenAlexW4309161072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.