ArticleJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2023
Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and Efficacy of the Novel OmniaSecure Defibrillation Lead Through Long-Term Follow-Up: Final Results From the LEADR Trial.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2026Trial
- [ICD electrode implantation for left bundle branch area pacing].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2025Review
- Differing impacts of cardiac implantable electronic device leads on tricuspid regurgitation.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
- Sensing and detection performance of the novel, small-diameter OmniaSecure defibrillation lead: in-depth analysis from the LEADR trial.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Long-Term Complications Related to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Successful implantation of an EVOQUE-tricuspid valve replacement system in a patient with two right ventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Atrioventricular node ablation for atrial fibrillation in the era of conduction system pacing.European heart journal · 2024Review
- Therapeutic potential of conduction system pacing as a method for improving cardiac output during ventricular tachycardia.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024Article
- Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Tachycardia Therapies: Past, Present and Future Directions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2023
Authors and funding
9 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImplantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are indicated for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. Despite enhancements in design and technologies, the ICD lead is the most vulnerable component of the ICD system and failure of ICD leads remains a significant clinical problem. A novel, small-diameter, lumenless, catheter-delivered, defibrillator lead was developed with the aim to improve long-term reliability. METHODS AND
resultsThe Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability (LEADR) study is a multi-center, single-arm, Bayesian, adaptive design, pre-market interventional pivotal clinical study. Up to 60 study sites from around the world will participate in the study. Patients indicated for a de novo ICD will undergo defibrillation testing at implantation and clinical assessments at baseline, implant, pre-hospital discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter until official study closure. Patients may be participating for a minimum of 18 months to approximately 3 years. Fracture-free survival will be evaluated using a Bayesian statistical method that incorporates both virtual patient data (combination of bench testing to failure with in-vivo use condition data) with clinical patients. The clinical subject sample size will be determined using decision rules for number of subject enrollments and follow-up time based upon the observed number of fractures at certain time points in the study. The adaptive study design will therefore result in a minimum of 500 and a maximum of 900 patients enrolled.
conclusionThe LEADR Clinical Study was designed to efficiently provide evidence for short- and long-term safety and efficacy of a novel lead design using Bayesian methods including a novel virtual patient approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.