Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36378671›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

RETRACTED: Improvement of non-invasive tests of liver steatosis and fibrosis as indicators for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with elevated cardiovascular risk profile using the PPAR-α/γ agonist aleglitazar.

Esmée J Grobbee, Vivian D de Jong, Ilse C Schrieks, Maarten E Tushuizen, Adriaan G Holleboom, Jean-Claude Tardif, A Michael Lincoff, Gregory G Schwartz, Manuel Castro Cabezas, Diederick E Grobbee

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Esmée J GrobbeeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Vivian D de JongJulius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4692-479X
Ilse C SchrieksJulius Clinical, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Maarten E TushuizenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Adriaan G HolleboomDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jean-Claude TardifMontreal Heart Institute Coordinating Center, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8200-8983
A Michael LincoffDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5Research), Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
Gregory G SchwartzDivision of Cardiology, VA Medical Center and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, United States of America.
Manuel Castro CabezasJulius Clinical, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Diederick E GrobbeeJulius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLUtrecht University · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCleveland Clinic · USDenver VA Medical Center · USLeiden University · NLMontreal Heart Institute · CAYulius · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists may have favorable outcomes on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. This study serves as proof of concept to evaluate whether dual PPAR-α/γ agonists improve non-invasive tests of liver steatosis and fibrosis.

methodsThis is a post-hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial comprising 7226 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and recent coronary artery disease randomized to receive aleglitazar, a PPAR-α/γ agonists, or placebo for two years. Main outcomes were change in non-invasive tests for liver steatosis and fibrosis: Liver Fat Score (LFS), Liver Accumulation Product (LAP), Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS).

resultsLFS, LAP and FIB-4 decreased upon treatment, whereas scores in the placebo group remained the same or increased (P<0.001). NFS responded differently but remained consistently lower than placebo. In the treatment group more participants shifted to a lower FIB-4 and NFS category, or improved in respect to the LAP cut-off values compared to the placebo group (P<0.001 for FIB-4 and LAP, P<0.004 for NFS). LFS had a low discriminative power in this study.

conclusionThis post-hoc analysis showed improvement of non-invasive tests of liver steatosis and fibrosis after starting dual PPAR-α/γ agonist treatment, adding to the evidence that this pathway has potential in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease treatment.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansHypoglycemic AgentsLiverLiver CirrhosisOxazolesPPAR alphaPPAR gammaRisk FactorsThiophenesaleglitazarHypoglycemic AgentsOxazolesPPAR alphaPPAR gammaThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID36378671
PMCPMC9665379
OpenAlexW4309070531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.