Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36378526›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2023

Pancreatectomy with resection and reconstruction of the superior mesenteric artery.

Ugo Boggi, Niccolò Napoli, Emanuele F Kauffmann, Sara Iacopi, Michael Ginesini, Cesare Gianfaldoni, Daniela Campani, Gabriella Amorese, Fabio Vistoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Robotic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy With Vein Resection and Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ugo BoggiDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7505-5896
Niccolò NapoliDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Emanuele F KauffmannDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Sara IacopiDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Michael GinesiniDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Cesare GianfaldoniDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6185-5569
Daniela CampaniDivision of Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Gabriella AmoreseAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Fabio VistoliDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

PancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsAbdomenHepatic ArteryHumansMesenteric Artery, SuperiorPortal Vein

Identifiers

PMID36378526
PMCPMC10361681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.