Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36378522›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Automatic Detection of Adverse Drug Events in Geriatric Care: Study Proposal.

Frederic Gaspar, Monika Lutters, Patrick Emanuel Beeler, Pierre Olivier Lang, Bernard Burnand, Fabio Rinaldi, Christian Lovis, Chantal Csajka, Marie-Annick Le Pogam, SwissMADE study

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Natural Language Processing andJMIR medical informatics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Frederic GasparCenter for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0225-7294
Monika LuttersService of Clinical Pharmacy, Baden University Hospital, Baden, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7063-578X
Patrick Emanuel BeelerDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6097-2480
Pierre Olivier LangClinique de Montchoisi, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3966-822X
Bernard BurnandUnisanté Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5678-6044
Fabio RinaldiDalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence Research, Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana, Universita della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5718-5462
Christian LovisDivision of Medical Information Sciences, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2681-8076
Chantal Csajka *Center for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0660-082X
Marie-Annick Le Pogam *Unisanté Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1672-3644
SwissMADE study *See Acknowledgments, .
University of Geneva · CHCentre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CHAC Immune (Switzerland) · CHClinique Valmont · CHKantonsspital Baden · CHSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne-third of older inpatients experience adverse drug events (ADEs), which increase their mortality, morbidity, and health care use and costs. In particular, antithrombotic drugs are among the most at-risk medications for this population. Reporting systems have been implemented at the national, regional, and provider levels to monitor ADEs and design prevention strategies. Owing to their well-known limitations, automated detection technologies based on electronic medical records (EMRs) are being developed to routinely detect or predict ADEs.

objectiveThis study aims to develop and validate an automated detection tool for monitoring antithrombotic-related ADEs using EMRs from 4 large Swiss hospitals. We aim to assess cumulative incidences of hemorrhages and thromboses in older inpatients associated with the prescription of antithrombotic drugs, identify triggering factors, and propose improvements for clinical practice.

methodsThis project is a multicenter, cross-sectional study based on 2015 to 2016 EMR data from 4 large hospitals in Switzerland: Lausanne, Geneva, and Zürich university hospitals, and Baden Cantonal Hospital. We have included inpatients aged ≥65 years who stayed at 1 of the 4 hospitals during 2015 or 2016, received at least one antithrombotic drug during their stay, and signed or were not opposed to a general consent for participation in research. First, clinical experts selected a list of relevant antithrombotic drugs along with their side effects, risks, and confounding factors. Second, administrative, clinical, prescription, and laboratory data available in the form of free text and structured data were extracted from study participants' EMRs. Third, several automated rule-based and machine learning-based algorithms are being developed, allowing for the identification of hemorrhage and thromboembolic events and their triggering factors from the extracted information. Finally, we plan to validate the developed detection tools (one per ADE type) through manual medical record review. Performance metrics for assessing internal validity will comprise the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, F

resultsAfter accounting for the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we will include 34,522 residents aged ≥65 years. The data will be analyzed in 2022, and the research project will run until the end of 2022 to mid-2023.

conclusionsThis project will allow for the introduction of measures to improve safety in prescribing antithrombotic drugs, which today remain among the drugs most involved in ADEs. The findings will be implemented in clinical practice using indicators of adverse events for risk management and training for health care professionals; the tools and methodologies developed will be disseminated for new research in this field. The increased performance of natural language processing as an important complement to structured data will bring existing tools to another level of efficiency in the detection of ADEs. Currently, such systems are unavailable in Switzerland. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40456.

Indexed as

adverse drug eventsadverse drug reactionsaged 65 and olderantithromboticsautomated adverse drug event reporting systemclinical decision support systemelectronic medical recordhemorrhagehospitalsinappropriate prescribinginterdisciplinary researchmachine learningmedication errorsmulticenter studymultimorbiditynatural language processingolder inpatientspatient safetypolypharmacyquality of hospital carevenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID36378522
PMCPMC9709671
OpenAlexW4284681137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.