Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36378466›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2022

Sex-Based Difference in Bone Healing: A Review of Recent Pre-clinical Literature.

Steven S Kurapaty, Wellington K Hsu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven S KurapatyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 North St. Clair Street, Suite 1350, Chicago, IL, 6061, USA. steven.kurapaty@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8421-8864
Wellington K HsuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 North St. Clair Street, Suite 1350, Chicago, IL, 6061, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRecent literature has sought to understand differences in fusion failure, specifically considering how patient sex may play a role. Overall, there exists inconclusive data regarding any sex-based differences in bone healing. RECENT

findingsIn vitro studies examining the roles of sex hormones, 5-LO, IGF-1, VEGF, osteoclasts, and OPCs seem to show sexually dimorphic actions. Additionally, donor characteristics and stem cell environment seem to also determine osteogenic potential. Building on this biomolecular basis, in vivo work investigates the aforementioned elements. Broadly, males tend to have a more robust healing compared to females. Taking these findings together, differences in sex hormones levels, their timing and action, and composition of the inflammatory milieu underlie variations in bone healing by sex. Clinically, a robust understanding of bone healing mechanics can inform care of the transgender patient. Transgender patients undergoing hormone therapy present a clinically nuanced scenario for which limited long-term data exist. Such advances would help inform treatment for sports-related injury due to hormonal changes in biomechanics and treatment of transgender youth. While recent advances provide more clarity, conclusive answers remain elusive.

Indexed as

Animal modelBone healingSexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID36378466
PMCPMC9789279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.