Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36378458›Full record

ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2022

Co-creation of a student-implemented allied health service in a First Nations remote community of East Arnhem Land, Australia.

Ruth Barker, Susan Witt, Katrina Bird, Kylie Stothers, Emily Armstrong, Murphy Dhayirra Yunupingu, Eunice Djerrkŋu Marika, Louise Brown, Renae Moore, Narelle Campbell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring the "led" in health professional student-led experiences: a scoping review.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth BarkerJames Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2546-2581
Susan WittFlinders NT, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Katrina BirdJames Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-6683
Kylie StothersIndigenous Allied Health Australia, Katherine, Northern Territory, Australia.
Emily ArmstrongNorthern Institute, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Murphy Dhayirra YunupinguDhupuma Foundational Education Centre, East Arnhem Land, Northern Territory, Australia.
Eunice Djerrkŋu MarikaElder of the Gumatj People from Yirrkala, East Arnhem Land, Northern Territory, Australia.
Louise BrownJames Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0815-1730
Renae MooreTop End Health Service, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Narelle CampbellFlinders NT, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1088-1828
James Cook University · AUNorthern Territory Health Services · AUCharles Darwin University · AUDepartment of Land Resource Management · AUGovernment of the Northern Territory · AUKatherine Hospital · AU

Funding

Hot North Pilot Project Round 5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo co-create a culturally responsive student-implemented allied health service in a First Nations remote community and to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the service.

designCo-creation involved a pragmatic iterative process, based on participatory action research approaches. Feasibility and acceptability were determined using a mixed-method pre/postdesign.

settingThe service was in Nhulunbuy, Yirrkala and surrounding remote First Nations communities of East Arnhem Land, Northern Territory, Australia.

participantsCo-creation of the service was facilitated by the Northern Australia Research Network, guided by Indigenous Allied Health Australia leadership, with East Arnhem local community organisations and community members. Co-creation of the day-to-day service model involved local cultural consultants, service users and their families, staff of community organisations, students, supervisors, placement coordinators and a site administrator.

findingsA reciprocal learning service model was co-created in which culturally responsive practice was embedded. The service was feasible and acceptable: it was delivered as intended; resources were adequate; the service management system was workable; and the service was acceptable. Health outcome measures, however, were not appropriate to demonstrate impact, particularly through the lens of the people of East Arnhem. Recommendations for the service included: continuing the reciprocal learning service model in the long term; expanding to include all age groups; and connecting with visiting and community-based services.

conclusionThe co-created service was feasible and acceptable. To demonstrate the impact of the service, measures of health service impact that are important to First Nations people living in remote communities of northern Australia are required.

Indexed as

Health Services, IndigenousHumansLearningNorthern TerritoryPopulation GroupsStudentscultural consultantsculturally responsivehealth equityreciprocal learning

Identifiers

PMID36378458
PMCPMC10099895
OpenAlexW4309066484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.