Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36378441›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

DIGE Analysis of Animal Tissues.

Alessio Di Luca, Ruth Hamill, Anne Maria Mullen, Giuliano Elia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessio Di LucaFaculty of Biosciences and Technology for Food, Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy.
Ruth HamillTeagasc, Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin, Ireland.
Anne Maria MullenTeagasc, Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin, Ireland.
Giuliano EliaPhilochem AG, Otelfingen, Switzerland. giuliano.elia@philochem.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) is an acrylamide gel electrophoresis-based technique for protein separation and quantification in complex mixtures. The technique addresses some of the drawbacks of conventional 2D polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE), offering improved sensitivity, more limited experimental variation, and accurate within-gel matching. 2D-DIGE is based on direct labeling of proteins with isobaric fluorescent dyes (known as CyDyes: Cy2, Cy3, and Cy5) prior to isoelectric focusing (IEF). Here, up to two samples and a reference pool (internal standard) can be mixed and loaded onto IEF for first dimension prior to SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate)-PAGE separation in the second dimension. After the electrophoretic run, the gel is imaged at the specific excitation wavelength for each dye, in sequence, and gel scans are recorded separately. For each individual protein spot, intensities recorded at the different wavelengths are integrated and the ratio between volumes normalized to that of the internal standard. This provides an immediate appreciation of protein amount variations under the different conditions tested. In addition, proteins of interest can still be excised and identified with conventional mass spectrometric techniques and further analyzed by other biochemical methods. In this chapter, we describe application of this methodology to separation and quantitation of protein mixtures from porcine muscle exudate, collected following centrifugation of muscle specimens (centrifugal drip) for the characterization of quality parameters of importance in meat industry.

Indexed as

ProteinsAnimalsElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelIsoelectric FocusingMass SpectrometrySwineTwo-Dimensional Difference Gel ElectrophoresisProteins2D-DIGECentrifugal dripCyDye DIGE FluorImage analysisInternal standardIsoelectric focusingMachine learning algorithmMass spectrometryPorcine muscle exudateSDS-PAGE

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.