Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36378342›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Perspectives of older women with early breast cancer on telemedicine during post-primary treatment.

Caroline R Buse, Erin A O'Hare Kelly, Hyman B Muss, Kirsten A Nyrop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caroline R BuseSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. caroline_buse@med.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9430-5865
Erin A O'Hare KellyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Hyman B MussSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kirsten A NyropSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

UNC-CH Summer Research Training in Aging for Medical StudentsT35AG038047 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JAN BUSBY-WHITEHEAD · 2010 to 2026
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS 5T35AG038047 UNC-CH Summer Research in Aging for Medical StudentsNIA NIH HHS T35 AG038047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTelemedicine has the potential to lessen healthcare burden of older patients due to frequent appointments, physical disabilities, and reliance on caretakers. To benefit from telemedicine, patients must have the capacity and willingness to engage with technology. This study aimed to better understand the telemedicine experiences of older women with non-metastatic breast cancer regarding visit convenience, completeness, and interpersonal satisfaction.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted in a convenience sample of women age 65+, post-primary treatment for stage I-III breast cancer, who had received in-person outpatient care at a cancer center in urban North Carolina before a telemedicine appointment occurring after March 2020. Patients were interviewed about their perceptions of telemedicine (telephone, video) as compared to in-person visits. Audio files of interviews were transcribed and analyzed for themes and subthemes established a priori in the interview protocol.

resultsFifteen patients (telephone = 5, video = 10) were consented and interviewed July-October 2021, mean age 74. Thirteen participants reported they preferred a hybrid care model that included telemedicine care over in-person care alone. COVID-19, physical disability, and transportation burden were the most common factors for telemedicine preference. Comfort with familiar face-to-face interactions and having a physical exam were common factors for in-person appointment preference. In-person appointment was favored early in the post-primary treatment phase; telemedicine was more acceptable when relationships were well-established and patients were farther out from diagnosis.

conclusionsPatient-provider discussions about appointment modality should take into account newness of diagnosis, patient familiarity with the care team, travel burden, and necessity of physical exam.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCOVID-19TelemedicineAgedDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansTelephoneBreast cancerOlder adultsPost-primary treatmentTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36378342
PMCPMC9664432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.