Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36378253›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Initial experience, feasibility, and technical development with an electromagnetic navigation assistance in percutaneous pelvic bone cementoplasty: retrospective analysis.

Tom Boeken, Geoffroy Pouliquen, Kévin Premat, Benjamin Benac, Eimad Shotar, Évelyne Cormier, Atika Talbi, Raphaël Bonaccorsi, Laetitia Morardet, Véronique Morel and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tom BoekenDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, APHP, 47, Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Geoffroy PouliquenDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, APHP, 47, Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Kévin PrematDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, APHP, 47, Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Benjamin BenacImactis, Grenoble, France.
Eimad ShotarDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, APHP, 47, Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Évelyne CormierDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, APHP, 47, Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Atika TalbiDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, APHP, 47, Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Raphaël BonaccorsiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, APHP, Paris, France.
Laetitia MorardetDepartment of Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, APHP, Paris, France.
Véronique MorelDepartment of Hematology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, APHP, Paris, France.
Jean-Philippe SpanoDepartment of Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, APHP, Paris, France.
Hugues Pascal-MousselardDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, APHP, Paris, France.
Jacques ChirasClinique Bizet, Paris, France.
Frédéric ClarençonDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, APHP, 47, Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France. frederic.clarencon@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6442-8239
Sorbonne Université · FRIMACTIS · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the feasibility and technical outcomes of pelvic bone cementoplasty using an electromagnetic navigation system (EMNS) in standard practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsMonocentric retrospective study of all consecutive patients treated with cementoplasty or reinforced cementoplasty of the pelvic bone with EMNS-assisted procedures. The endpoints were periprocedural adverse events, needle repositioning rates, procedure duration, and radiation exposure.

resultsA detailed description of the technical steps is provided. Thirty-three patients (68 years ± 10) were treated between February 2016 and February 2020. Needle repositioning was required for 1/33 patients (3%). The main minor technical adverse event was soft tissue PMMA cement leaks. No major adverse event was noted. The median number of CT acquisitions throughout the procedures was 4 (range: 2 to 8). Radiation exposure and mean procedure duration are provided.

conclusionElectromagnetic navigation system-assisted percutaneous interventions for the pelvic bone are feasible and lead to low rates of minor technical adverse events and needle repositioning. Procedure duration and radiation exposure were low. KEY POINTS: • Initial experience for 33 patients treated with an electromagnetic navigation assistance for pelvic cementoplasty shows feasibility and safety. • The use of an electromagnetic navigation system does not expose to high procedure duration or radiation exposure. • The system is efficient in assisting the radiologist for extra-axial planes in challenging approaches.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCementoplastyPelvic BonesBone CementsElectromagnetic PhenomenaFeasibility StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBone CementsCementoplastyFracturesOsteoporosisPelvic bones

Identifiers

PMID36378253
OpenAlexW4309095432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.