Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36378040›Full record

SynthesisJournal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan2022

Acupoint catgut embedding versus acupuncture for simple obesity: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Wei Jiali, Lai Lily, Lin Zhechao, Liu Jianping, Han Mei

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06091761 (Efficacy and Safety of Thread Embedding Acupuncture Combined With Auricular Acupuncture for Overweight and Obesity), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06091761 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Thread Embedding Acupuncture Combined With Auricular Acupuncture for Overweight and Obesity: Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled66ConditionsOverweight or ObesityArmsAuricular acupuncture, Thread embedding acupuncture, Sham Thread embedding acupuncture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei JialiSchool of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Lai LilyPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Hampshire S016 7NS, UK.
Lin ZhechaoSchool of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Liu JianpingSchool of Traditional medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Han MeiPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Hampshire S016 7NS, UK.
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of acupoint catgut embedding and acupuncture on simple obesity by Meta-analysis.

methodsStudies on clinical randomized controlled trials of acupoint catgut embedding for simple obesity which were published from January 2015 to November 2020 were searched in Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (Central), PubMed, China Science and Technology Journal Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database and Wanfang data-bases. And those that met the inclusion criteria were screened. RevMan5.3 was used for Meta-analysis. The "Risk of Bias" tool was used to evaluate the quality of included studies. R studio software was used for the measurement of publication bias.

resultsA total of 33 studies were included for Meta-analysis, including 2685 patients with simple obesity. Meta-analysis results showed the comparison of effectiveness rate was relative risk () = 1.12, 95%(1.08, 1.16), body mass index (BMI) was mean difference () = -1.12, 95% (-2.09, -0.14), waist circumference was = -2.14, 95% (-4.22, -0.06), and body mass was = -2.36, 95% (-3.99, -0.73). On the basis of diet and exercise intervention, the effectiveness rate [ = 1.12, 95% (1.05, 1.19)], BMI [ = -0.88, 95% (-1.35, -0.40)], waist circumference [ = -1.10, 95%(-4.27, 2.07)], and body mass [ = -0.68, 95%(-2.90, 1.54)]. The risk of bias of included literatures was low.

conclusionsAcupoint catgut embedding therapy was slightly better than acupuncture therapy in most of the outcomes. Moreover, the treatment frequency of acupoint catgut embedding is less with larger stimulation intensity, which is more conducive to clinical promotion.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyCatgutAcupuncture PointsHumansObesityRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicacupoint catgut embeddingacupunctureMeta-analysisobesity

Identifiers

PMID36378040
PMCPMC9924734
OpenAlexW4309365669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.